11. Verbs : Generality


11.1. Aspects

11.2. Tenses

11.3. Persons

11.4. Numbers

11.5. Moods

11.6. Stem-initial vowels

11.7. Preverbs

11.8. Affirmation and negation

11.9. Interrogation

11.10. Affix concatenation within verb complex

______________________________________________________________________


[See the chapter 12. for the classification of verbs. Each category of verbs corresponds to a specific construction.]

______________________________________________________________________


◘◘◘ Passive voice ◘◘◘


The Laz language has ergative construction in all tenses and aspects (→ 12., 13.). Therefore there is no passive voice in Laz like in languages without ergative construction.

______________________________________________________________________


11.1. Aspects


11.1.1. Indicative imperfective markers (Mood-and-aspect markers)

11.1.2. Tense-and-aspect markers


Morphologically, two verbal aspects are distinguished in Laz : imperfective and perfective.


Imperfective forms express, according to the category, the mood and the tense of verb, « present durative action or present state »

« iterative action »

« general truth »

« future-in-past »

etc


Perfective forms express, according to the category, the mood and the tense of verb,

« action which is realized once in the past »

« action which has been realized »

« action which will be realized once in the future »

« present state resulting from an action »

etc


All aspect markers are polyvalent in Laz : there are mood-and-aspect markers and tense-and-aspect markers.

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.1. Indicative imperfective markers (Mood-and-aspect markers)


If a Laz verb has only one stem, the latter is followed by a “post-stem” (→ 11.1.1.1.) in

indicative imperfective. A contrario, absence of post-stem, in indicative mood, is the mark of perfective aspect.


A few exceptions are observed : see “One-stemmed verbs without post-stem” (→ 11.1.1.2.).


Some categories of verbs are always imperfective (→ 12.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.1.1. Post-stems


Post-stems are devided into five groups according to their morphology. The representative forms are as follows :


[A] -am, -em, -im, -om, -um


[B] -er, -ur


[C] -omer (West) ~ -umer (CentreEast)


[D] -umer (Centre)(HP) ~ -umar (ÇX)


[E] -um (West)(Centre) ~ -umer (HP) ~ -ar (ÇX)


(A-1) Sole {-am} and {-um}(*) are observed in all dialects.


(*) Regional variants : {-ap} and {-up} in Hopa and Çxala, with

combinatory variants {-ap’} and {-up’} before ejective consonants.


(A-2) {-em} is rare. It nevertheless appears regularly in causative verbs which are formed with the suffix {-ap-}(→ 12.5.2.) in the dialects of Pilarget etc in Arhavi. It corresponds to {-am} ~ {-ap} in other dialects.

(A-3) {-om} is often observed in central dialects. It corresponds generally to {-um} ~ {-up} in other dialects.


Exception : z*iroms (FN)(AH) (see) corresponds to z*irams (PZ), zirams (AŞ)(*),z*i(r)ops (HP).


(*) Oppositon between /z*/ and /z/ exists rarely in the dialects of Ardeşen.


(B) The variants {-e} and {-u} are very often observed in central and eastern dialects where the phoneme /r/ after vowel has a great tendency to disappear.


(C) Sole example : u3’omers (West), u3’umers (Centre)(East) (tell to s.o. definite)


(D) Ex. : çumers (Centre)(HP), çumars (ÇX) (wait)


(E) Ex : dodums (West)(Centre), dodumers (HP), dodvars (ÇX) (put)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Some stems with and without post-stem :


[A] -ç- / -çam- ~ -çap- give to eat

-t’ax- / -t’axum- ~ -t’axup- break


[B] -mt’- / -mt’er- run away, escape

-putx-/ -putxur- fly


[C] -3’v-(*) tell to a determined person (***)

/ -3’omer- (West) ~ -3’umer- (CentreEast)


[D] -çv- (*) / -çumer- (Centre)(HP) ~ çumar- (ÇX) wait


[E] -dv- (*) / -dum- (West)(Centre) ~ -dumer- (HP) ~ -dvar- (ÇX) put


(*) The phoneme /v/ after consonant disapppears regularly before /u/ in all dialects.


●●● (***) « Say to undetermined persons » is another verb : perfective stem of indicative mood ; {-t’k’v-} ~ {-tkv-}. The representative form (indicative imperfective present 3rd person singular) of this verb is it’urs (West) ~ zop’ons (Centre) ~ tkumers (HP) ~ tkumars (ÇX).


(This is a three-stemmed verb in western dialects : the stem of potential, impersonal and experiential moods is {-zit’-}.)


For the determination of beneficiary of action, see the sub-chapter 11.6. (pre-stem vowels).

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.1.2. One-stemmed verbs without post-stem


-bir- (West)  play

-bir- (CentreEast) sing

-gzal- (CentreEast) go, leave (1)

-mç’im- rain (2)

-ncir-  sleep (West)

lie down ; sleep (CentreEast)

-nçir- (West) ~ -mçvir- (CentreEast) swim (3)

-orom- (Centre) ~ -x’orop- (Est) love (4)

-ster- (CentreEst) play

-xel- (CentreEst)  be glad (5)



(1) The same root exists in western dialects with semantic and morphological difference. It has two meanings : “walk” and “go, leave”. It forms a verb fluctuating between one-stemmedness and multi-stemmedness. There are two forms of stem in fluctuation in indicative imperfective : {-gzar-} and {-gzalam-}. But there is only one form of perfective stem : {-gzal-}.


(2) In the dialects of Çxala, the stem of the verb “rain” is with post-stem. In indicative, the imperfective stem is {-mç’vip-}, while the perfective stem is {-mç’v-}.


(3) The variant {-nçvir-} is observed in central and eastern dialects.


(4) This verb “love” has no perfective form. The comparison with regional forms of the stem of a verb being derived from the same root (*) permits to deduce that the last two phonemes of the stem {-x’orop-} do not form a post-stem. The form {-orom-}, observed in central dialects, results from double phonetic evolution : disparition of the phoneme /x’/ and transformation of /p/ in /m/ on the analogy of other verbs because there is never /p/ at the final of verb in these dialects (→ 22. Phonemics).


(*) An evolutional verb (→ 12.3., 13.3.) meaning “fall in love with”


In western dialects, the verb “love” is a stative verb having the potential-like structure. See Potential mood (→ 11.5.) and Stative verbs (→ 12.2., 13.2.).


(5) In central and eastern dialects, there are two forms of imperfective stem of this verb in fluctuation : {-ixel-} without post-stem and {-ixelam-} with post-stem.


In western dialects, the imperfective stem of the verb “be glad” has only one form with post-stem : {-ixelam-}.

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.1.3. Multi-stemmed verbs


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.1.1.3.1. Multi-stemmed verbs with unique root


« look »


Perfective stem of indicative mood:

-3’er- (PZ)(*) ~ -3’ed- (AŞ) ~ -3’k’ed- (CentreEast)


Imperfective stem of indicative mood :

-3’er- (West) ~ -3’k’er- (CentreEast)


Stem of potential and experiential moods (→ 11.5.) :

-3’elim/3’olim - (PZ) ~ -3’omil- (AŞ) ~ -3’k’omil- (CentreEast)


(*) In Pazar, there is only one form of stem in indicative mood.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.1.1.3.2. Multi-rooted verbs


[a two-rooted verb] « eat » (*)


Perfective stem of indicative mood :

-şk’om-(West) ~ -ç’k’om- (CentreEast)


Imperfective stem of indicative mood :

-mxor-(West)(FN) ~ -mpxor- (FN-a part) ~ -pxor- (AH) ~ -mxor- (HP)


(*) Verb with unique root in Çxala. The stem is {-ç’k’om-}.



[a three-rooted verb] « do »


Perfective stem of indicative mood :

-ø- (= nul)(***) ~ -v- (Centre) ~ -x’v- (East)


Imperfective stem of indicative mood :

-kum- (West) ~ -kom- (Centre) ~ -kip- (East)


Stem of the other moods (→ 11.5.) :

-xin- ~ -xen- (West) ~ -xen- (Centre) ~ -xven- (East)


(***) This is not the only no-rooted verb (!!) (→ 13.9. Irregular verbs).

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.1.3.3. Two-rooted verb having only one stem in indicative mood


-bgar- ~ -mgar- (HP) weep


The verb “weep” is two-rooted : { -bgarin-} ~ {-mgarin-} in potentiel, impersonal and experiential moods (→ 11.5.2.1.1.C). But, in indicative mood, there is only one stem for two aspects.

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.2. Tense-and-aspect markers

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.2.1. {-t’-}


The « recollection-expectation » marker {-t’-} (= non-present tense marker) is, in the same time, one of imperfective aspect markers. See the subject « Tenses » (→ 11.2.2.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.1.2.2. {-n}


The morpheme {-n} is a quadruple marker with three facets.


First facet : it is the marker of imperfective aspect, present tense, 3rd person and singular

in indicative mood of certain number of actional verbs.


Second facet : it is the marker of imperfective aspect, présent tense, singular and the « suprapersonality »

in potential mood (→ 11.5., 13.5.) of actional verbs,

in experiential mood (→ 11.5., 13.7.) of actional verbs,

in indicative mood of a great number of stative verbs (→ 12.2., 13.2.),

and in indicative mood of evolutional verbs (→ 12.3., 13.3.).


Third facet : it is the marker of imperfective aspect, present tense, indetermined number and impersonality

in impersonal mood (→ 11.5. 13.6.) of actional verbs.

______________________________________________________________________


11.2. Tenses


11.2.1. Present tense and past tense markers

11.2.2. « Recollection-expectation » marker = non-present tense marker



●●● Future tenses in Laz are derived from optative mood (→ 11.5.).


See the chapter “Verbs : Conjugation” (→ 13.) for compound tenses like pluperfect and “auditive past”.

______________________________________________________________________


11.2.1. Present tense and past tense markers 

_____________________________________________________________________________


11.2.1.1. Present tense markers


Present tense markers are polyvalent in Laz : they mark the person in the same time, and most of them mark also the number.


Persons (→ 11.3.) and numbers (→ 11.4.) are described in their respective sub-chapter. We begin here by presenting the markers of “present tense 3rd person singular” which are suffixed to the imperfective stem of actional verbs in indicative mood :

{-n} after the post-stems {-er} and {-ur}(***),

{-s} in all other case.


(***) Consonant group /rn/ is intolerable at the final of the word in Laz. In all dialects, {-er- + -n} and {-ur- + -n} are realised respectively in the form of {-en} and {-un}.


Imperfective present expresses

« general truth, habit, iterative action »

« action being realized in the present » and

« present state » (*).


(*) Affirmation profixes mark sometimes the iterative action (→ 11.8.2.3., 11.8.2.4. ).


●●● In Laz, there is no morphological difference between « present tense » and « present progressive tense » like in English.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The vowels {i-}, {o-} and {u-}, which are indicated in bold letters at the initial of certain number of verbs shown below, are pre-stems (→ 11.6.).

(The initial vowel of the verb oroms, in non-bold letters, is not one of them.)


(***)

çams ~ çaps  he gives to eat ; he is giving to eat

t’axums ~ t’axups he breaks ; he is breaking


imt’en (1) he runs away ; he is running away

putxun (*) (1) it flies ; it is flying


u3’omers ~ u3’umers he tells to a determined person ; he is telling to ~


o3’k’en ~ o3’k’ers (CentreEast)(2) he looks ; he is looking


imxors ~ ipxors ~ imxors (3) he eats ; he is eating

ikums ~ ikoms ~ ikips he does ; he is doing


ibgars ~ imgars (HP) he weeps ; he is weeping

ibirs (West) he plays ; he is playing

ibirs (CentreEast) he sings ; he is singing

igzars (West) [1] he walks ; he is walking

[2] he goes, he leaves ; he is going, he is leaving

igzals (CentreEast)  he goes, he leaves ; he is going, he is leaving

mç’ims ~ mç’vips (ÇX)(4) (it) rains ; (it) is raining

incirs (West) he sleeps ; he is sleeping

incirs (CentreEast) [1] he lies down ; he is lying down 

[2] he sleeps ; he is sleeping

inçirs ~ imçvirs (5) he swims ; he is swimming

oroms (Centre) ~ x’orops (East) he loves

isten ~ isters (CentreEast) (6) he plays ; he is playing

ixels (CentreEast) (7) he is glad



(***) There is no gender in Laz. We do not write systematicallyhe, she or it”.


(*) cun (it is flying) in the dialects of Çamlıhemşin- M3’anu ;

jun (it is flying) in the dialects of Ardeşen- Jilen-Mzğem where the opposition exists between /j/ and /c/.


(1) [imt’er- + -n > imt’en], [putxur- + -n > putxun]


(2) Very often o3’k’en in Fındıklı. The forms no3’ers /no3’en (PZ) ~ no3’en (AŞ), beginning by a preverb (→ 11.7., 19.), correspond to it in western dialects.


(3)

(3-1) The same form is observed in western dialects and in Hopa.

(3-2) The variant impxors is observes in certain villages in Fındıklı.

(3-3) This verb has only one stem in the dialects of Çxala where the form of indicative imperfective present 3rd person singular is ç’k’omups.


(4) The subject of this verb is mç’ima (= the rain). The whole sentence is mç’ima mç’ims (PZ)(FN)(AH)(HP) ~ mç’ima mç’iy (ÇM)(AŞ) ~ mç’vima mç’vips (ÇX).


(5) The form imçfirs is often heard instead of imçvirs. The phoneme /v/ after consonant can be voiced [v] or voiceless [f]. They are free variants. Another variant inçvirs is observed, too.


(6) Very often isten in Fındıklı.


(7) Also ixelams, with post-stem.

Only ixelams in western dialects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[Regional phonetic variants]


(PZ) In the dialects of Pazar, consonant groups /-ms/ and /-rs/ at the end of verb are often replaced by /-y/. The group /-rs/ may also be pronounced /-s/ (ex.: imxos, incis).


●●● (ÇM)(AŞ) In the dialects of Çamlıhemşin and Ardeşen (except at Dutxe), consonant groups /-ms/ and /-rs/ at the end of verb are prononced only in interrogative forms. They are replaced regularly, in assertive forms, by /y/ (after /a/, /o/ and /u/) and by /y/ or /ø [= nul]/ (after /e/ and /i/).


Interrogative forms :

çams-i, t’axums-i, u3’omers-i, imxors-i, ikums-i, ibgars-i, ibirs-i, igzars-i, igzalams-i, mç’i(m)s-i, incirs-i, inçirs-i, ixelams-i


The morpheme {-i} is interrogation marker (→ 11.9.).


Assertive forms :

çay ~ çams (*), t’axuy, u3’ome(y), imxoy, ikuy, ibgay, ibi(y), igzalay, igzay, mç’i(y), inci(y), inçi(y), ixelay


(*) Sometimes çams, maybe in order to avoid the homonymity with çay (= tea).


●●● (AŞ- Dutxe) In the dialects of Dutxe, in assertive forms, consonant groups /-ms/ and /-rs/ at the end of verb are followed by epithetic vowel /-u /: ex.: çamsu, t’axumsu, imxorsu ...... etc. The phoneme /m/ disappears often before /-su/. In this case the lengthning of the precedent vowel is observed : ikumsu becomes iku(u)su; and mç’imsu, mç’i(i)su.


The epithetic vowel is inaccented. Its presence does not change the place of accent of the word.


(CentreEast) In central and eastern dialects, the phoneme /r/ disappears very often before /-s/ at the end of word (ex.: u3’umes, ibgas).


But the weakening of /r/ is not observed in the dialects spoken at Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc.


Interrogation marker {-i} belongs to the verb complex and is pronounced without caesura with what precedes it. But it is « independent » concerning the prosody. It has its own accent and is pronounced always with falling tone.

______________________________________________________________________


11.2.1.2. Past tense markers


Past tense markers are polyvalent in Laz like present tense markers : they mark the person in the same time, and most of them mark also the number.


Persons (→ 11.3.) and numbers (→ 11.4.) are described in their respective sub-chapter. WE begin here by presenting the markers of past tense 3rd person singular which are suffixed to the perfective stem of actional verbes in indicatifve mood :


The marker of past tense 3rd person singular is {-u} in imperfective as well as in perfective aspect. (***)


(***) The morpheme {-u} is marker of past tense, singular and suprapersonality

in potential mood (→ 11.5., 13.5.) of actional verbs,

in experiential mood (→ 11.5., 13.7.) of actional verbs,

in indicative mood of most of stative verbs (→ 12.2., 13.2.),

and in indicative mood of evolutional verbs (→ 12.3., 13.3.).


It is also marker of past tense, indetermined number and impersonality

in impersonal mood (→ 11.5. 13.6.) of acional verbs.



The simple perfective expresses :

« action which is accomplished before one’s eyes »

« action which was accomplished once in the past »

« action which was nearly accomplished il the past »

etc


See the sub-chapters of « Evolutional verbs » for their perfective aspect (→ 12.3., 13.3.).


●●● In Laz, there is no morphological difference between “past tense” and “present perfect tense” like in English.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(***)

çu he gave to eat ; he has given to eat

t’axu he broke ; he has broken


imt’u he ran away ; he has run away

putxu it flied ; it has flied away


u3’u he told to a determined person ;

he has told to a determined person


o3’k’edu (CentreEast)(1) he looked ; he has looked


şk’omu (West) ~ ç’k’omu (CentreEast)(2) he ate ; he has eaten

u (West) ~ vu (Centre) ~ x’u (East) (3) he did ; he has done


ibgaru ~ imgaru (HP) he wept ; he has wept

ibiru (West) he played ; he has played

ibiru (CentreEast) he sang ; he has sung

igzalu (West) [1] he walked ; he has walked

[2] he left ; he has left

igzalu (CentreEast) he left ; he has left

mç’imu (West, Centre, HP) ~ mç’u (ÇX) (it) rained ; (it) has rained

inciru (West) he slept ; he has slept

inciru (CentreEast) [1] he lay down ; he has lain down

[2] he slept ; he has slept

inçiru ~ imçviru ~ inçviru he swimmed ; he has swimmed

isteru (CentreEast) he played ; he has played

ixelu he was delighted ; he is delighted


(***) There is no gender in Laz. We do not write systematicallyhe, she or it”.


(1) In western dialects, no3’eru (PZ) ~ no3’edu (AŞ) with preverb (→ 11.7., 19.).


(2) Also oşk’omu ~ oç’k’omu with affirmation profix (→ 11.8.). (*)


(3) The stem is {-x’v-} in eastern dialects. The phoneme /v/ after consonant disappears regularly before /u/ in all dialects.


(4) Also domç’imu ~ domç’u (ÇX) with affirmation profix (→ 11.8.). (*)


■(*) Accentuation rules change in the presence of profix (→ 11.8.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.2.2. « Recollection-expectation » marker {-t’-} = non-present tense marker


The morpheme {-t’-}, imperfective-and-non-présent marker, is always followed by one of « past tense (-and-person) markers » or the « optative mood marker ».


{-t’-} + past tense marker = imperfective past tense

{-t’-} + optative mood marker = imperfective optative mood


See the sub-chapter of Moods (→ 11.5.). Future tenses of the verb of existence and most of stative verbs derive from imperfective optative, while those of actional verbs and some of stative verbs derive from perfective optative.


Imperfective past tense expresses principally

« durative action or state in the past »

« iterative action in the past »,


et also, in the dialects of Arhavi,

« future-in-the-past ».


(Other dialects have specific forms of futur-in-the-past ». → 11.5.1.2.3., 13.4.)


Forms of simple perfective 3rd person singular are shown below.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


(*)(**)

çamt’u ~ çap’t’u he was giving to eat

t’axumt’u ~ t’axup’t’u he was breaking


imt’ert’u he was running away

putxurt’u (1) he was flying


u3’omert’u ~ u3’umert’u he was telling to a determined person


o3’k’ert’u (CentreEast)(2) he was looking


imxort’u ~ ipxort’u he was eating

ikumt’u ~ ikomt’u ~ ikip’t’u (3) he was doing


ibgart’u ~ imgart’u he was weeping

ibirt’u (West) he was playing

ibirt’u (CentreEast) he was singing

igzalt’u (CentreEast) he was going, he was leaving

igzart’u (West) he was walking ; he was leaving

mç’imt’u ~ mç’vip’t’u (3) (it) was rainig

incirt’u (West) he was sleeping

incirt’u (CentreEast) he was lying down ; he was sleeping

inçirt’u ~ imçvirt’u ~ inçvirt’u he was swimming

oromt’u ~ x’orop’t’u (3) he loved

istert’u he was playing

ixelt’u he was glad


(*) There is no gender in Laz. We do not write systematicallyhe, she or it”.


(**) Here we did not give the translation corresponding to the meaning in future-in-the-past which is observed in the dialects of Arhavi.


(1) curt’u at Çamlıhemşin- M3’anu ;

jurt’u at Ardeşen- Jilen-Mzğem.


(2) no3’ert’u in the western dialects.


(3) Voiceless plosives /p/, /t/, /3/, /ç/ and /k/ before ejective consonant become ejectives /p’/, /t’/, /3’/, /ç’/ and /k’/ in all dialects.


The syllable {-t’u} including the non-present tense marker {-t’-} (=recollection-expectation marker) is inaccented and its presence does not change the place of accent of the word.

______________________________________________________________________


11.3. Persons


11.3.1. Person markers having only one function

11.3.2. Multi-functional person markers


Laz verbs are « impersonal », « monopersonal » or « bipersonal » according to their category (→ 12.) and mood (→ 11.5.). Bipersonal verbs agree with the subject and the beneficiary or with the subject and the principal complement.

____________________________________________________________


11.3.1. Person markers having only one function

 

11.3.1.1. Anteposed person markers : {b-}{ø-}{ø-}

11.3.1.2. Anteposed person markers II : {m-}{g-}{ø-}

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.1.1. Anteposed person markers : {b-}{ø-}{ø-}


Representative forms :

b- (***) : 1st person

ø- [nul]  : 2nd person

ø- [nul]  : 3rd person


Anteposed person markers {b-}{ø-}{ø-} are prefixed to the pre-stem (→ 11.6.). They indicate the person of the complement in a small number of evolutional verbs (→ 12.3.), and the person of the subject in all other cases.


●●● (***) There are many variants of the 1st person marker {b-}.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.1.1.1. Variants of {b-} before consonant


b-  : before voiced consonants d, z*, c, g ; v, z, j, ğ ; l, r, y

p-  : before voiceless consonants t, 3, ç, k ; f, s, ş, x (*)

p-  : before ejective consonants t’, 3’, ç’, k’; x’

ø- (1) : before bilabial consonants b, p, p’, m


(m-) (2) : if the stem begins by /n + consonant/

b- (3) : if the stem begins by /n + vowel/

(f-) ~ (p-)  (4) : if the stem begins by /xt’/(West) ~ /xt/(CentreEast)



ex. b- : (ğurun) bğurur I die ; I am dying

(zop’ons) bzop’on I say (Centre); I tell a tale (East)


ex. p- : (çams ~ çaps) pçam ~ pçap I give to eat ; I am giving to eat

(şums ~ şupspşum ~ pşup I drink ; I am drinking


ex. p’- : (ç’arums ~ ç’arups) p’ç’ari I wrote ; I have written (CentreEast)

(x’orops) p’x’orop I love (East)



(1) In the dialects of Pazar, the 1st person marker {b-} appears as an infix in the middle of the stem (→ 13.9. Irregular verbs).


ex. : (putxun) {b-} + putxur > puptxur (PZ)(*) I fly ; I am flying


(*) putxur in other dialects

(2) Si {b-} + /n + consonant/ , {b-} + n > m


ex. : (ncaxums ~ ncaxups) {b-} + ncaxum > mcaxum I forge ; I am forging

ex. : (nç’arums) (West) {b-} + nç’arum > mç’arum I write ; I am writing



(3) Examples of {b-} + /n + vowel/ are rare.


[In the examples shown below,

the morphemes {go-} and {ok’o-} are preverbs (→11.7., 19.)]


ex. gobnorum I rinse ; I am rinsing

ex. ok’obnağuri (CentreEast)(*) I fainted away


(*) cf (AŞ-Ok’ordule) ok’obrağuni I fainted away



(4) If {b-} + /xt/ or /xt’/ , {b-} + x > f ~ p


[The morpheme {mo-} is a preverb (→ 11.7., 19.).]


moft’i < mo- + {b-} + xt’i (West) I came ; I have come

mofti < mo- + {b-} + xti (FN- a part)

mopti < mo- + {b-} + xti (FN- a part)(AH)(East)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.1.1.2. Variants of {b-} before vowel


In principle,


v- : in Pazar, Çamlıhemşin, Ardeşen-west

b- : in Ardeşen-east, Fındıklı, Arhavi

v- : in Hopa, Çxala


ex. : vimt’er ~ bimt’er ~ vimt’er I run away ; I am running away

vibgar ~ bibgar ~ vimgar I weep ; I am weeping


Exceptionally,

p-  (*) : before /x’/ and /x’v/ lost during historical phonetic evolution


(*) Comparative studies on actual Laz dialects permit, sometimes, to reach a persuasive conclusion concerning phonetic evolution of the language before it was written. Regular verbs having the stem beginning by /x’/ in eastern dialects became irregular or were replaced by other words in western and central dialects which lost this phoneme.


Some examples :


[Arhavi] [Hopa]

p’azum p’x’azup I plane ; I am planing

p’orom p’x’orop I love

p’ilom p’x’vilup I wound ; I am wounding

p’uram (1) p’x’urap (2) I cry ; I am crying


(1) urams : (AH) (subject : female) she cries ; she is crying

cf. mğorams : (subject : male) he cries ; he is crying


(2) x’uraps : (HP)(subject : male or female) he or she cries ; he or she is crying


●●● In eastern dialects also, there are some cases of combination /p’ + vowel/ which should result from the disparition of /x’v / (→ 13.9. Irregular verbs).

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.1.2. Anteposed person markers II : {m-}{g-}{ø-}


Representative forms:

m- : 1st person

g- : 2nd person

ø- [nul]  : 3rd person


Anteposed person markers II {m-}{g-}{ø-} are prefixed to the pre-stem, i.e. they take the same place as the anteposed person markers I {b-}{ø-}{ø-}.


Anteposed person markers II {m-}{g-}{ø-} indicate the person of the subject, the beneficiary or the principal complement according to the category and the mood of the verb :


person of the subject in dative case of « stative verbs with dative subject »

« evolutional verbs »

« actional verbs in potentiel mood »

« actional verbs in experiential mood »

etc


person of the principal complement of « actional transitive verbs in indicative

mood »

etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.1.2.1. Variants of anteposed person markers II {m-}{g-}


The 1st person marker {m-} is realized under three forms : {m-}{mp’-}{ø-}.


ø- : before nasal bilabial /m/

mp’- : before lost /x’/ and /x’v/ (*)

m-  : in all other cases


The 2nd person marker {g-} is realized under four forms : {g-}{k-}{k’-}{ø-}.


ø- : before velar plosives /g/, /k/, /k’/ (**)

k’-  : before ejectives other than /k’/ ;

: before lost /x’/ and /x’v/ (*)

k-  : before voiceless non-ejectives other than /k/


g- : in all other cases


(*) : (WestCentre) before the stem of ilums ~ iloms (wound, kill)

and all verbs derived from it ;

  (Centre) before the stem of oroms (love) and all verbs derived from it.


(**){g-} appears often as infix in the dialects of Pazar.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.1.2.2. Use of anteposed person markers II {m-}{g-}{ø-}


[A] çams ~ çaps (give to eat):


(WestCentre) (East)

mçams mçaps : he gives me (something) to eat

kçams kçaps : he gives you (something) to eat

çams çaps : he gives him (something) to eat


kçam kçap : I give you (something) to eat

pçam pçap : I give him (something) to eat


[B] oroms (Centre), x’orops (East) (love)


(Centre) (East)

mp’oroms (*) mx’orops : he loves me

k’oroms k’x’orops : he loves you

oroms x’orops : he loves him (her or it) (***)


(*) When the phoneme /x’/ disappeared, its ejectivity should remain under the form of ejective consonant /p’/ which is homoorganic with /m/.


(***) There is no gender in Laz. We do not write systematicallyhe, she or it” or “him, her or it”.

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.2. Multi-functional person markers


There are three groups of multi-functional morphemes which mark the person.


11.3.2.1. Postposed person markers I = present tense markers

11.3.2.2. Postposed person markers II = past tense markers

11.3.2.3. Anteposed person markers III = pre-stem {i-/u-}

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.2.1. Postpsed person markers I = present tense markers (→ 11.2.)


Table of present tense-and-person markers

(See → 11.4. Numbers).



singular

plural

1st pers.

-ø

-ø (+ -t)

2nd pers.

-ø

-ø (+ -t)

3rd pers.

-s, -n

-an (*)


(*){-nan}(**) after /r/; the phoneme /r/ disappears before {-nan} in most of dialects.


(**){-lan} in Çxala

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.1.1. Anteposed person marker I (→ 11.3.1.1.)

+ postposed person marker I

= present tense I



singular 

plural

1st pers.

b- ... -ø

b- ... -ø + (-t)

2nd pers.

ø- ... -ø

ø- ... -ø + (-t)

3rd pers.

ø- ... -s, -n

ø- ... -an (*)


(*) and {-nan}~ {-lan}



[A] t’axums ~ t’axups (break) in indicative imperfective present


(WestCentre) sg.  pl.

1st pers. p’t’axum p’t’axumt (1)(2)

2nd pers. t’axum t’axumt (1)(2)

3rd pers. t’axums (3)(4) t’axuman


(East) sg. pl.

p’t’axup p’t’axupt

t’axup t’axupt

t’axups t’axupan


The suffixation of the 3rd person plural marker {-an} does not change the place of accent of the word. Accent is on the antepenultimate in the forms of 3rd person plural, and on the penultimate in other forms.


(1) P’t’axumtu and t’axumtu in Çamlıhemşin (except in M3’anu) and in Ardeşen.

But p’t’axumt-i, t’axumt-i in interrogative.


■ The presence of epithetic vowel /-u /, inaccented, does not change the place

of accent.


(2) P’t’axumte and t’axumte in Çamlıhemşin- M3’anu.

But p’t’axumt-i, t’axumt-i in interrogative.


■ The presence of epithetic vowel /-e /, inaccented, does not change the place

of accent.


(3) T’axuy in Çamlıhemşin and in Ardeşen (xecept in Dutxe).

But t’axums-i in interrogative.


(4) T’axumsu ~ t’axusu in Ardeşen- Dutxe (→ 11.2.1.1.).

But t’axums-i ~ t’axus-i in interrogative.



[B] çams ~ çaps (give to eat) in indicative imperfective present


sg. pl.

pçam ~ pçap pçamt ~ pçapt

çam ~ çap çamt ~ çapt

çams ~ çaps çaman ~ çapan


[Regional variants are parallel to those of t’axums ~ t’axups]



[C] imt’en (run away) in indicative imperfective present


sg.  pl.

vimt’er ~ bimt’er (1) vimt’ert ~ bimt’ert (1)(2)(3)

imt’er (1) imt’ert (1)(2)(3)

imt’en imt’eran ~ imt’enan (4)


(1) Often bimt’e ~ vimt’e, imt’e, bimt’et ~ vimt’et, imt’et.


(2) Vimt’erte, imt’erte in Çamlıhemşin- M3’anu.


(3) Vimt’ertu, imt’ertu in Çamlıhemşin (except in M3’anu) and in Ardeşen-west.

Bimt’ertu, imt’ertu in Ardeşen-east.


(4) İmt’eran is the « logical » form which is observed only in Pazar and in some villages of altitude like M3’anu in Çamlıhemşin and Jilen-Mzğem in Ardeşen.


İmt’enan (and sometimes, imt’ernan) is the variant that is observed the most widely.


● Variant imt’elan is observed in Borçka- Çxala.



[D] ulun (go) in indicative imperfective present


vulur ~ bulur vulurt ~ bulurt

ulur ulurt

ulun uluran ~ ulunan (*)(1)(2)


[Regional variants are parallel to those of other verbs]


(*) Sometimes also ulurnan.


(1) The variant ulvan is observed in Çamlıhemşin, Ardeşen and Hopa- Azlağa. Evolution *uluan > *ulwan > ulvan is possible after disparition of phoneme /r/ of uluran between vowels.


(2) The variant ulan is observed in Çxala.



[E] u3’omers ~ u3’umers (tell to a determined person) in indicative imperfective present


(West)

vu3’omer ~ bu3’omer vu3’omert ~ bu3’omert

u3’omer u3’omert

u3’omers (1) u3’omeran ~ u3’omenan (2)


(CentreEast)

bu3’umer ~ vu3’umer bu3’umert ~ vu3’umert

u3’umer u3’umert

u3’umers u3’umenan ~ u3’umelan (3)


(1) (ÇM)(AŞ) u3’omey; in interrogative u3’omers-i ?


(2) Sometimes u3’omernan


(3) (ÇX) u3’umelan


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.1.2. Anteposed person marker (I + II)

+ postposed person marker I

= bipersonal conjugation in present tense I


A great number of Laz verbs accord, in the same time, to the subject (agent) and to the beneficiary or the principal complement. An example of bipersonal conjugation is shown below.


çams ~ çaps (give to eat) in indicative imperfective present


(WestCentre)


me

you

him, her, it

I

---

kçam

pçam

you

mçam

---

çam

he, she, it

mçams

kçams

çams

we

---

kçamt

pçamt

you

mçamt

---

çamt

they

mçaman

kçaman

çaman


(East)


me

you

him, her, it

I

---

kçap

pçap

you

mçap

---

çap

he, she, it

mçaps

kçaps

çaps

we

---

kçapt

pçapt

you

mçapt

---

çapt

they

mçapan

kçapan

çapan


On the table shown above, the complement in the dative case is singular. See → 11.4.2. for tables with plural complement.


●●● In Laz, nasal consonants /m/ and /n/ at the initial of word are voiceless if they are followed by voiceless consonant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.1.3. Anteposed person marker II

+ postposed suprapersonal tense marker I

= present tense II



singular

plural

1st pers.

m- ... -n

m- ... -an

2nd pers.

g- ... -n

g- ... -an

3rd pers.

ø- ... -n

ø- ... -an


This type of formation concerns

« actional verbs in potentiel mood » (→ 11.5., 13.)

« actional verbs in experiential mood » (→ 11.5., 13.)

« most of stative verbs » (→ 12.2., 13.2.) and

« evolutional verbs » (→ 12.3., 13.3.)


See respective chapters and sub-chapters.

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.2.2. Postposed person markers II = past tense markers (→ 11.2.)


Table of past tense-and-person markers (See for the number → 11.4.).



singular

plural

1st pers.

-i

-it (1)

2nd pers.

-i

-it (1)

3rd pers.

-u

-es (2)(3)


(1) (ÇM)(AŞ) Sometimes -itu ~ -ite.


(2) (ÇM)(AŞ) -ey ~ -e in assetive; -es in interrogative.


● in Dutxe, -esu


(3) (FN) Often -ez at the final of sentence and before voiced consonant.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.2.1. Anteposed person marker I

+ postposed person marker II

= past tense I



singular 

plural

1st pers.

b- ... -i

b- ... -it

2nd pers.

ø- ... -i

ø- ... -it

3rd pers.

ø- ... -u

ø- ... -es


●●● See the preceding subject (11.3.2.2.) for the regional variants.



[A] t’axums (break) in indicative simple perfective : « I broke ; you broke » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. p’t’axi p’t’axit

2nd pers. t’axi t’axit

3rd pers. t’axu t’axes



[B] çams ~ çaps (give to eat) in indicative simple perfective : « I gave to eat » etc

sg. pl.

1st pers. pçi pçit

2nd pers. çi çit

3rd pers. çu çes



[C] imt’en (run away) in indicative simple perfective : « I ran away » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. vimt’i ~ bimt’i vimt’it ~ bimt’it

2nd pers. imt’i imt’it

3rd pers. imt’u imt’es



[D] ulun (go) (*) in indicative simple perfective : « I went » etc


sg. pl.

1st pers. vidi ~ bidi vidit ~ bidit

2nd pers. idi idit

3rd pers. idu ides


(*) This verb is multi-rooted (→ 13.9.).



[E] u3’omers ~ u3’umers in indicative simple perfective

: « I told to a determined person » etc


sg. pl.

1st pers. vu3’vi ~ bu3’vi vu3’vit ~ bu3’vit

2nd pers. u3’vi u3’vit

3rd pers. u3’u (*) u3’ves


(*) The stem is {-3’v-}. The phoneme /v/ after consonant disappears regularly

before /u/ in all dialects.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.2.2. Anteposed person marker (I + II)

+ postposed person marker II

= bipersonal conjugation in past tense I


çams ~ çaps (give to eat) in indicative simple perfective



me

you

him, her, it

I

---

kçi

pçi

you

mçi

---

çi

he, she, it

mçu

kçu

çu

we

---

kçit

pçit

you

mçit

---

çit

they

mçes

kçes

çes


On this table, the complement is in the singular.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.3.2.2.3. Anteposed person marker II (→ 11.3.1.2. )

+ suprapersonal tense marker II

= past tense II



singular

plural

1st pers.

m- ... -u

m- ... -es

2nd pers.

g- ... -u

g- ... -es

3rd pers.

ø- ... -u

ø- ... -es


This type of formation concerns

« actional verbs in potential mood » (→ 11.5., 13.)

« actional verbs experiential mood » (→ 11.5., 13.)

« most of stative verbs » (→ 12.2., 13.2.) et

« evolutional verbs » (→ 12.3., 13.3.)


See respective chapters and sub-chapters.

______________________________________________________________________


11.3.2.3. Anteposed person markers III = pre-stem {i-/u-}


The pre-stem {i-/u-}(→ 11.6.) has different forms according to the person.


1st pers. i-

2nd pers. i-

3rd pers. u-


The function of pre-stems depends on the category and the mood of the verb. We show here the verb u3’omers ~ u3’umers (tell to a determined person). The pre-stem {i-/u-} indicates that the action is done for a determined person.


The combination with anteposed person markers II{m-}{g-}{ø-} permit to distinguish the 1st and 2nd persons.


u3’omers ~ u3’umers in indicative imperfective present : « I tell him » etc


(West)

person and number of subject

beneficiary = dative complement

1st pers.sg.

2nd pers.sg. 

3rd pers. sg. 

1st pers. sg.

---

gi3’omer

vu3’omer ~ bu3’omer

2nd pers. sg.

mi3’omer

---

u3’omer

3rd pers. sg.

mi3’omers

gi3’omers

u3’omers

1st pers. pl.

---

gi3’omert

vu3’omert ~ bu3’omert

2nd pers. pl.

mi3’omert

---

u3’omert

3rd pers. pl. 

mi3’omeran

~ mi3’omenan

gi3’omeran

~ gi3’omenan

u3’omeran

~ u3’omenan


(CentreEast)

person and number of subject

beneficiary = dative complement

1st pers. sg.

2nd pers. sg.

3rd pers. sg.

1st pers. sg.

---

gi3’umer

bu3’umer ~ vu3’umer

2nd pers. sg.

mi3’umer

---

u3’umer

3rd pers. sg.

mi3’umers

gi3’umers

u3’umers

1st pers. pl.

---

gi3’umert

bu3’umert ~ vu3’umert

2nd pers. pl.

mi3’umert

---

u3’umert

3rd pers. pl.

mi3’umenan

~ mi3’umelan

gi3’umenan

~ gi3’umelan

u3’umenan

~ u3’umelan



u3’omers ~ u3’umers in indicative simple  perfective: « I told him » etc


(All dialects)

person and number of subject

beneficiary = dative complement

1st pers. sg.

2nd pers. sg.

3rd pers. sg.

1st pers. sg.

---

gi3’vi

vu3’vi ~ bu3’vi

2nd pers. sg.

mi3’vi

---

u3’vi

3rd pers. sg.

mi3’u

gi3’u

u3’u

1st pers. pl.

---

gi3’vit

vu3’vit ~ bu3’vit

2nd pers. pl.

mi3’vit

---

u3’vit

3rd pers. pl.

mi3’ves

gi3’ves

u3’ves

______________________________________________________________________


11.4. Number


11.4.1. Multi-functional number markers


11.4.1.1. {-ø}, {-t}

11.4.1.2. {-s

11.4.1.3. {-n}, {-an}

11.4.1.4. {-u}, {-es}


11.4.2. Number markers of beneficiary

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.1. Multi-functional number markers

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.1.1. {-ø}, {-t}


As we saw in the preceding subject (11.3. Persons), the forms of 1st and 2nd persons plural finish, in present as well as in past tense, by the morpheme {-t} which is not a tense marker but person-and-number marker.


The sign {-ø} represents, as number marker, absence of all other markers, i.e. {-t}{-s}{-n}{-an}{-u}{-es}. It indicates 1st and 2nd persons singular.


The morpheme {-t} marks also the 1st and 2nd persons plural of beneficiary of bipersonal verbs (→ 11.4.2.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.1.2. {-s}


The morpheme {-s} has three functions : it marks present tense, 3rd person and singular.


See its use in the forms of perfective optative (→ 11.5., 13.4., 13.5., 13.6., 13.7.).


It is suprapersonal in the forms of potential optative (→ 11.5.2.) etc.

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.1.3. {-n}, {-an}


The morphemes {-n}(singular) and {-an}(plural) are multi-functional : they mark present tense, 3rd person and the number.


They are suprapersonal in the forms of

« potential mood (→ 11.5., 13.5.) of actional verbs »

« experiential mood (→ 11.5., 13.7.) of actional verbs »

« impersonal mood (→ 11.5. 13.6.) of actional verbs»

« most of stative verbs (→ 12.2., 13.2.) » and

« evolutional verbs (→ 12.3., 13.3.)».


The morpheme {-n} marks also imperfective aspect.


The morpheme {-an} does not mark a particular aspect. It marks also the 3rd person plural of perfective optative (→ 11.5., 13.4.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.1.4. {-u}, {-es}


The morphemes {-u}(singular) and {-es}(plural) are tri-functional : they mark past tense, 3rd personand the number.


They are suprapersonal in the forms of

« potential mood (→ 11.5., 13.5.) of actional verbs »

« experiential mood (→ 11.5., 13.7.) of actional verbs »

« impersonal mood (→ 11.5. 13.6.) of actional verbs »

« most of stative verbs (→ 12.2., 13.2.) » and

« evolutional verbs (→ 12.3., 13.3.)».


They do not mark any particular aspect.

______________________________________________________________________


11.4.2. Number markers of beneficiary


Bipersonal verbs are plural-marked by {-t}, if the beneficiary is 1st or 2nd persons plural, even if the subject is singular.


çams ~ çaps (give to eat)

in indicative imperfective present « I give him to eat » etc


(WestCentre)

subject

beneficiary

me

us

you (sg.)

you (pl.)

him, her, it ; them

1. sg.

---

kçam

kçamt

 pçam

2. sg.

mçam

mçamt

---

 çam

3. sg.

mçams

mçaman

kçams

kçaman

 çams

1. pl.

---

kçamt

 pçamt

2. pl.

mçamt

---

 çamt

3. pl.

mçaman

kçaman

 çaman


(East)

subject

beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg.

2. pl.

3. sg. ; pl.

1. sg.

---

kçap

kçapt

 pçap

2. sg.

mçap

mçapt

---

 çap

3. sg.

mçaps

mçapan

kçaps

kçapan

 çaps

1. pl.

---

kçapt

 pçapt

2. pl.

mçapt

---

 çapt

3. pl.

mçapan

kçapan

 çapan


●●● The phonemes /m/ and /n/ at the initial of word are voiceless before voiceless consonant


u3’omers ~ u3’umers in indicative simple perfective « I told him » etc


(All dialects)

subject

beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg. 

2. pl.

3. sg. ; pl.

1. sg. 

---

gi3’vi

gi3’vit

vu3’vi ~ bu3’vi

2. sg. 

mi3’vi

mi3’vit

---

u3’vi

3. sg. 

mi3’u

mi3’ves

gi3’u

gi3’ves

u3’u

1. pl. 

---

gi3’vit

vu3’vit ~ bu3’vit

2. pl. 

mi3’vit

---

u3’vit

3. pl. 

mi3’ves

gi3’ves

u3’ves


______________________________________________________________________


11.5. Moods (+ future tenses)


11.5.1. Indicative mood (+ optative, votive,

imperative, prohibitive, prohibito-optative moods)

11.5.2. Potential mood (+ potential-optative, potential-votive moods)

11.5.3. Impersonl mood (+ impersonal-optative, impersonal-votive moods)

11.5.4. Experiential mood (+ experiential-optative, experiential-votive moods)(*)


(*) Experiential-optative mood, possible in theory, is not attested.


Moods in Laz are formed on two levels : fundamental moods (indicative, potential, impersonal and experiential) and derived moods (optative, votive, imperative, prohibitive and prohibito-optative).


Sole non-causative actional verbs (→ 12.4.) have the four fundamental moods. Other verbs have only indicative mood.


Imperative, prohibitive and prohibito-optative moods derive only from indicative mood.


●●● Future tenses derive from optative moods in Laz.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


◘◘◘ subjunctive mood ◘◘◘


There is no subjuncrive mood in Laz.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1. Indicative mood and moods which derive from it

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.1. Indicative mood


All verbal forms that are shown up to here in this chapter are indicative. We show now the moods which derive from it.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.2. Optative mood (+ future)


The morpheme {-a-} is the marker of all kinds of optative moods : i.e.

« optative mood » (derived from indicative) which can be

imperfective or

perfective,

« potential-optative mood » (→ 11.5.2.) and

« impersonl-optative mood » (→ 11.5.3.).


Optative marker is suffixed

to the non-present marker {-t’-} in imperfective aspect, and

to the stem , directly, in perfective aspect.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.1.2.1. Simple optative


[Ex. : a stative verb in imperfective optative 3rd pers. sg.]


xert’as (< -xer- + -t’- + -a- + -s) : « he shall stay sitting »


-xer- : stem of the stative verb xers ~ xen (be sitting) (*)

-t’- : non-present marker = « recollection-expectation » marker

-a- : optative marker

-s : present tense 3rd person singular marker


(*) xers, only in Pazar


[conjugation]

singular  plural

1st pers. pxert’a pxert’at

2nd pers. (1) (xert’a) (xert’at)

3rd pers. xert’as (2) xert’an (3)


(1) Forms of 2nd person are observed accompanied with “verb postpositions” (= postposed subordinative conjunctions) (→ 6.2.) and also in the formation of future tenses.


(2) (ÇM)(AŞ) xert’ay in assertive sentence, xert’as-i ? in interrogative.


(3) xert’an < xert’a- + -an  : the two /a/ vowels have fused in one vowel



[an actional verb in perfective optative 3rd person singular]


mç’imas (< -mç’im- + -a- + -s) : « it shall rain »


-mç’im- : stem of the verb mç’ims ([it] rains)

-a- : optative marker

-s : present tense 3rd person singular marker


(ÇM)(AŞ) mç’imay in assertive sentence, mç’imas-i ? in interrogative.


● (ÇX) mç’vas (representative form is mç’vips)



{Optative + verb postposition = adverbial clause} (→ 6.2., 13.)


Future tense, future-in-the-past tense etc derive from optative moods.


Prohibito-optative mood derives from imperfective optative (→ 11.5.1.6.).



[a bipersonal verb in perfective optative]


u3’omers ~ u3’umers in perfective optative  :  « he shall tell me » etc


(All dialects)

subject

beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg. 

2. pl.

3. sg., pl.

1. sg. 

---

gi3’va

gi3’vat

vu3’va ~ bu3’va

2. sg. 

(mi3’va)

(mi3’vat)

---

(u3’va)

3. sg. 

mi3’vas

mi3’van

gi3’vas

gi3’van

u3’vas

1. pl. 

---

gi3’vat

vu3’vat ~ bu3’vat

2. pl. 

(mi3’vat)

---

(u3’vat)

3. pl. 

mi3’van

gi3’van

u3’van


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.1.2.2. Future tense


Future tense of Laz verbs, derived from optative moods (*), presents important morphological difference according to the dialects.


(*) Future tenses of the verb of existence and most of stative verbs derive from imperfective optative mood, while those of actional verbs and a part of stative verbs derive from perfective optative mood.


The syllable including the optative marker {-a-} is accented in all forms of future tense in all dialects.


t’axums ~ t’axups (break): « I will break » etc


[A] (PZ-west and centre)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axare p’t’axatere

2nd pers. t’axare t’axatere

3rd pers. t’axasere t’axanere ~ t’axanene



[B] (PZ-east)(ÇM)(AŞ)(FN)


sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axare (1) p’t’axaten

2nd pers. t’axare (1) t’axaten

3rd pers. t’axasen t’axanen


(1)(ÇM) p’t’axar, t’axar.


■ In this case also, accent is on the syllable including the optative marker {a-}.



[C] (AH)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axare p’t’axaten

2nd pers. t’axare t’axaten

3rd pers. t’axasen t’axanoren ~ t’axanon


(AH- Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc) often p’t’axar, t’axar.



[D] (HP) There are two series of future tense forms in the dialects of Hopa : the ones identical with those observed in Arhavi and the others - much more frequently used - shown below. The second series is composed as follows :

{optative form with, in certain dialects, some alteration + stative verb unon (*) which is also altered in certain cases}

(*) unon =  “want, desire” (→ 12.2., 13.2.).


[D-1] Mxigi

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axaminon p’t’axatminonan (1)

2nd pers. t’axaginon t’axatginonan (1)

3rd pers. t’axasunon t’axasunonan



[D-2] Makreal

sg. pl.

1st 1st pers. p’t’axaminon p’t’axaminonan

2nd pers. t’axaginon t’axaginonan

3rd pers. t’axasinon t’axasinonan (2)



[D-3] Sarp

sg. pl.

1st 1st pers. p’t’axaminon p’t’axaminonan

2nd pers. t’axaginon t’axaginonan

3rd pers. t’axasiyon t’axasiyonan (2)


(1) at Mxigi, the plural marker {-t} is pronounced.

(2) at Makreal and at Sarp, the initial vowel of unon has evoluted in /i/ in the forms of 3rd person.



[E] (ÇX)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axaun p’t’axatun

2nd pers. t’axaun t’axatun

3rd pers. t’axasun t’axanun


Sometimes p’t’axaunon, t’axaunon, t’axasunon, p’t’axatunon, t’axatunon, t’axanunon.


_____________________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.2.3. Future-in-the-past


The future-in-the-past tense is an aspectual hybrid : the stem is perfective , while the non-present marker (= recollection-expectaion marker) is imperfective. It corresponds well to its function. It expresses « unsatisfactory mental state (imperfective) resulting from non-realization of an action which should be done once in the past (perfective) »


t’axums ~ t’axups (break): « I was going to break » etc


[A] (PZ)(ÇM)(AŞ)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axart’u p’t’axatert’u

2nd pers. t’axart’u t’axatert’u

3rd pers. t’axasert’u t’axanert’u



[B-1] (FN) Sumla

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axat’i p’t’axat’it

2nd pers. t’axat’i t’axat’it

3rd pers. t’axat’u t’axat’es



[B-2] (FN) Ç’urç’ava

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axat’t’i p’t’axat’t’it

2nd pers. t’axat’t’i t’axat’t’it

3rd pers. t’axastun (*) t’axat’t’es


(*) In central and eastern dialects, ejective consonants after fricative consonant lose regularly their ejectivity.



[C] (AH) There is no specific form of future-in-the-past in the dialects of Arhavi. Indicative imperfective passt tense forms (→ 11.2.2.) have also the meaning of future-in-the-past in Arhavi.



[D-1] (HP) Mxigi

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axamint’u p’t’axatmint’es

2nd pers. t’axagint’u t’axatgint’es

3rd pers. t’axasunt’u t’axasunt’es



[D-2] (HP) Makreal

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axamint’u p’t’axamint’es

2nd pers. t’axagint’u t’axagint’es

3rd pers. t’axasint’u t’axasint’es



[E] (ÇX)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axaunt’i p’t’axaunt’it

2nd pers. t’axaunt’i t’axaunt’it

3rd pers. t’axasunt’u t’axanunt’es


Accent is always on the syllable including the optative marker {-a-} in the forms of future-in-th-past.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.3. Votive mood


Votive mood expresses :

« hypothesis contrary to the reality »

« condition having no or very little chance of becoming effective »

and, very often,

« a wish which will never be fulfilled »


and also, in western dialects and in those of Fındıklı,

« circumlocutory suggestion or request »

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.1.3.1. (West)(FN)


In western dialectes and those of Fındıklı :


votive imperfective = {indicative imperfective past + -k’o (*)}

votive perfective = {indicative simple perfective + -k’o (*)}


(*) or, sometimes, {-k’ona} in Ardeşen and Fındıklı.


We show here only the votive perfective which is more frequently used. See the chapter 13 “Verbs : Conjugation”


●●● In western dialects, the 1st and 2nd persons plural marker is postposed to {-k’o}. The 3rd person plural marker {-es} is circumposed to {-k’o} (or the latter is infixed within the former).


{-ek’es}(PZ)

{-ek’oy} ~ {-ek’os}(ÇM)(AŞ)



t’axums ~ t’axups (break): « if I broke » etc or « Can I break ? » etc


(PZ) sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axik’o p’t’axik’ot

2nd 2nd pers. t’axik’o t’axik’ot

3rd 3rd pers. t’axuk’o t’axek’es



(ÇM)(AŞ) sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axik’o p’t’axik’ot

2nd pers. t’axik’o t’axik’ot

3rd pers. t’axuk’o t’axek’oy (*)


(*) t’axekos-i ? in interrogative.


● Variants : p’t’axik’ona, t’axik’ona, t’axuk’ona in singular.



(FN) sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axik’o p’t’axit’k’o

2nd pers. t’axik’o t’axit’k’o

3rd pers. t’axuk’o t’axesko

● Variants : p’t’axik’ona, t’axik’ona etc


Votive mood marker {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} is inaccented and do mot change the place of accent of the word.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.1.3.2. (AH)(HP)(ÇX)


In eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi, the votive mood the most frequently used has the same form as the future-in-the-past tense of the dialect of Sumla in Fındıklı (11.5.1.2.3.B-1). See the chapter 13 “Verbs : Conjugation”


Sometimes the suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona}(AH) and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} (HP) are added for emphasis.


sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axat’i p’t’axat’it

2nd pers. t’axat’i t’axat’it

3rd pers. t’axat’u t’axat’es


[emphatic forms](AH)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axat’ik’o p’t’axat’it’k’o

2nd pers. t’axat’ik’o t’axat’it’k’o

3rd pers. t’axat’uk’o t’axat’esko

● Variants : p’t’axat’ikona, t’axat’ikona etc


[emphatic forms](HP)

sg. pl.

1st pers. p’t’axat’ik’on p’t’axat’it’k’on

2nd d pers. t’axat’ik’on t’axat’it’k’on

3rd pers. t’axat’uk’on t’axat’eskon


● Variants : p’t’axat’ikonna, t’axat’ikonna etc


The suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} are inaccented and do not change the place of accent of the word.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.4. Imperative


Imperative mood has only forms of the 2nd person in Laz. They are identical with those of indicative simple perfective. The context and the tone permit to distinguish them without any problem.


t’axums ~ t’axups (break) : « Break ! »


sg. pl.

1st pers. --- ---

2nd pers. t’axi t’axit

3rd pers. --- ---



Some monopersonal verbs in imperative mood :


[representative forms] [imperative forms]


doxedun (sit down) : doxedi ! , doxedit !

imt’en (run away) : imt’i ! , imt’it !

mulun (come) : moxt’i ! , moxt’it ! (West)

~ moxti ! , moxtit ! (CentreEast)

ulun (go) : idi ! , idit !


■ Accent is on the initial of the forms doxedun, doxedi, doxedit.



A bipersonal verg in imperative:


u3’omers ~ u3’umers : « tell me ! » « tell him ! » etc


(All dialects)

subject

beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg.pl. 

3. sg.pl.

1. sg. 

---



---

---

2. sg. 

mi3’vi

mi3’vit

u3’vi

3. sg.  

---

---

1. pl. 

---

---

2. pl. 

mi3’vit

u3’vit

3. pl. 

---

---

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.5. Prohibitive mood I


In laz, prohibitive mood has a morphology quite different from imperative mood. It has only 2nd person forms like imperative mood.


Prohibitive = {mot + indicative imperfective present}


(doxedun) mot doxedur !  : do not sit down !

mot doxedurt ! : do not sit down ! (pl.)


(ibgars) mot ibgar ! : do not weep !

~ (imgars) ~ mot imgar !

(imt’en) mot imt’er !  : do not run away !

(mulun) mot mulur !  : do not come !

(t’axums) mot t’axum !  : do not break !

(ulun) mot ulur !  : do not go !



■■■ Prohibitive marker mot is inaccented. As the adverb mot (why) is strongly accented, the homophonous word are never confused in the conversation.


(doxedun) mot doxedur ?  : why do you sit down ?

(ibgars) mot ibgar ? : why do you weep ?

~ (imgars) ~ mot imgar ?

(imt’en) mot imt’er ?  : why do you run away ?

(mulun) mot mulur ?  : why do you come ?

(t’axums) mot t’axum ?  : why do you break ?

(ulun) mot ulur ?  : why do you go ?


The variants mo ~ moy of the prohibitive marker are homophonous with those of the interrogative adverb.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.1.6. Prohibito-optative


Prohibito-optative = {mot + imperfective optative } in all dialects except those of Pazar.


●●● {mot + perfective optative} in Pazar. (See the chapter of “Verbs : Conjugation”)


Use of 2nd person forms is rare.


[Some monopersonal verbs in prohibito-optative]


[A] ikums ~ ikoms ~ ikips (do)


[A-1](West)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot vikumt’a mot vikumt’at

~ mot bikumt’a ~ mot bikumt’at

2nd pers. (mot ikumt’at) (mot ikumt’at)

3rd pers. mot ikumt’as mot ikumt’an

~ mot ikumt’ay



[A-2](Centre)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot bikomt’a mot bikomt’at

2nd pers. (mot ikomt’a) (mot ikomt’at)

3rd pers. mot ikomt’az mot ikomt’an

~ mot ikomt’as


[A-3](East)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot vikip’t’a mot vikip’t’at

2nd pers. (mot ikip’t’a) (mot ikip’t’at)

3rd pers. mot ikip’t’az mot ikip’t’an

~ mot ikip’t’as



[B] ulun (go)


[B-1](West)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot bulurt’a mot bulurt’at

2nd pers. (mot ulurt’a) (mot ulurt’at)

3rd pers. mot ulurt’as mot ulurt’an

~ mot ulurt’ay


[B-2](CentreEast)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot bulut’a mot bulut’at

2nd pers. (mot ulut’a) (mot ulut’at)

3rd pers. mot ulut’az mot ulut’an

~ mot ulut’as



[C] t’axums ~ t’axups (break)


[C-1](WestCentre)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot p’t’axumt’a mot p’t’axumt’at

2nd pers. (mot t’axumt’a) (mot t’axumt’at)

3rd pers. mot t’axumt’as mot t’axumt’an

~ mot t’axumt’ay


[C-2](East)

sg. pl.

1st pers. mot p’t’axup’t’a mot p’t’axup’t’at

2nd pers. (mot t’axup’t’a) (mot t’axup’t’at)

3rd pers. mot t’axup’t’az mot t’axup’t’an

~ mot t’axup’t’as



[D] doxedun (sit down)


sg. pl.

1st pers. mot dopxedurt’a mot dopxedurt’at

2nd pers. (mot doxedurt’a) (mot doxedurt’at)

3rd pers. mot doxedurt’as mot doxedurt’an


● Regional variants are no more mentioned here.



[A bipersonal verb in prohibito-optative]


u3’omers ~ u3’umers : « he shall not tell me » etc


(West)

sujet

beneficiary

1. sg.

2. sg.

3. sg., pl. 

1.sg.

---

mot gi3’omert’a

mot vu3’omert’a ~ mot bu3’omert’a

2.sg.

(mot mi3’omert’a)

---

(mot u3’omert’a)

3.sg. 

mot mi3’omert’as

mot gi3’omert’as

mot u3’omert’as

1.pl.

---

mot gi3’omert’at

mot vu3’omert’at ~ mot bu3’omert’at

2.pl.

(mot mi3’omert’at)

---

(mot u3’omert’at)

3.pl.

mot mi3’omert’an

mot gi3’omert’an

mot u3’omert’an


(CentreEast)

sujet

beneficiary

1. sg.

2. sg.

3. sg., pl.

1.sg.

---

mot gi3’umet’a

mot bu3’umet’a ~ mot vu3’umet’a

2.sg.

(mot mi3’umet’a)

---

(mot u3’umet’a)

3.sg. 

mot mi3’umet’as

mot gi3’umet’as

mot u3’umet’as

1.pl.

---

mot gi3’umet’at

mot bu3’umet’at ~ mot vu3’umet’at

2.pl.

(mot mi3’umet’at)

---

(mot u3’umet’at)

3.pl.

mot mi3’umet’an

mot gi3’umet’an

mot u3’umet’an


If the beneficiary or the principal complement are 1st or 2nd person plural, the verb takes the forms of mot gi3’umert’at, mot mi3’umert’an etc, even if the subject is singular.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.2. Potential moods


Potential moods express, according to the contexte,


[1] « capacity of doing action »


[2] « involuntary realization of action »


●●● Dative construction


In potential moods, the subject of potential or involuntary action is in dative case, while the complement (objectof potential or involuntary action) is in absolutive case.


Sole non-causative actional verbs have potential moods.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.2.1. Potential mood

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.2.1.1. Potential imperfective


Potential mood imperfective present

= {anteposed person marker II

+ pre-stem a-

+ stem of potential mood

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -en (< -er + -n)}



singular

plural

1st pers.

m- + -a- + stem + -en

m- + -a- + stem + -eran ~ -enan

2nd pers.

g- + -a- + sem + -en

g- + -a- + stem + -eran ~ -enan

3rd pers.

ø- + -a- + stem + -en

ø- + -a- + stem + -eran ~ -enan


The stems of potential and indicative moods are not always identical (→ examples B and C).


[A] t’axums ~ t’axups (break): « I can break » etc or

« I break involuntarily » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axen mat’axeran ~ mat’axenan

2nd pers. gat’axen gat’axeran ~ gat’axenan

3rd pers. at’axen at’axeran ~ at’axenan



[B] ulun (go) : « I can go » etc or

« I go involuntarily » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. malen maleran ~ malenan

2nd pers. galen galeran ~ galenan

3rd pers. alen aleran ~ alenan


The subject of potential or involuntary action is in dative case in most of Laz dialects. In the dialects of Çamlıhemşin and Ardeşen, absolutive and fused oblique cases are observed instead of lost dative case. Different regional versions for « he can go to Hopa » are shown below.


(PZ) Himus Xopaşe alen. [subject in dative case]

(ÇM-M3’anu) Himu Xopaşa alen. [subject in fused oblique case]

(AŞ-Ok’ordule) Him Xopaşa alen. [subject in absolutive case]

(FN) Heyaz Xopaşa alen. [subject in dative case]

~ Hemuz Xopaşa alen.

(AH) Hemus Xopaşa alen. [subject in dative case]

(HP)(ÇX) Emus Xopaşa alen. [subject in dative case]



[C] ibgars ~ imgars (weep)(1) : « I can weep » etc or

« I weep involuntarily » etc


[C-1](WestCentre) sg. pl.

1st pers. mabgarinen mabgarineran ~ mabgarinenan

2nd pers. gabgarinen gabgarineran ~ gabgarinenan

3rd pers. abgarinen abgarineran ~ abgarinenan



[C-2](HP) sg. pl.

1st pers. mamgarinen mamgarinenan

2nd pers. gamgarinen gamgarinenan

3rd pers. amgarinen amgarinenan


(1) Multi-stemmed verb. The stem of potential mood is {-bgarin-} ~ {-mgarin-}.


In potential mood, if the stem includes at least one vowel, accent is on the last vowel of the stem in all aspects and tenses. If the stem do not include any vowel, accent is on the syllable including the pre-stem vowel.


Potential mood imperfective past tense (ex. : malert’u : I was able to go) is described in the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation » (13.).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.2.1.2. Potential perfective


Potential mood simple perfective:



singular

plural

1st pers.

m- + -a- + stem + -u

m-+ -a- + stem + -es

2nd pers.

g- + -a- + stem + -u

g- + -a- + stem + -es

3rd pers.

ø- + -a- + stem + -u

ø- + -a- + stem + -es



[A] t’axums ~ t’axups (break) : « I could break » etc or

« I broke involuntarily » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axu mat’axes

2nd pers. gat’axu gat’axes

3rd pers. at’axu at’axes


[B] ibgars ~ imgars (weep) : « I could weep » etc or

« I wept involuntarily » etc


[B-1](WestCentre) sg. pl.

1st pers. mabgarinu mabgarines

2nd pers. gabgarinu gabgarines

3rd pers. abgarinu abgarines



[B-2](HP) sg. pl.

1st pers. mamgarinu mamgarines

2nd pers. gamgarinu gamgarines

3rd pers. amgarinu amgarines


Compound tenses (like « pluperfect » and « auditive past ») of potential perfective are described in the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation » (13.).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.2.1.4. Actional verbs lacking potential moods


The pre-stem of the bipersonal verb u3’omers ~ u3’umers (tell to a determined person) is allways {i-/u-}. As it is impossible to replace it by another pre-stem, this verb is lacking in potential moods (potential, potential-optative and potential-votive). It is only an example among many others.


A great number of Laz verbs are thus lacking in moods other than indicative because of the restriction in the choice of pre-stem (→ 16.)

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.2.2. Potential-optative


Potential-optative

= {anteposed person marker II

+ pre-stem a-

+ stem of potential mood

+ optative marker -a

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -s or -an}



singular

plural

1st pers.

m- + a- + stem + -a + -s

m- + a- + stem + -a + -an (*)

2nd pers.

g- + a- + stem + -a + -s

g- + a- + stem + -a + -an (*)

3rd pers.

ø- + a- + stem + -a + -s

ø- + a- + stem + -a + an (*)


(**) {-a + -an} is fused in /-an/ in all dialects.


[A] t’axums ~ t’axups (break)  : « he shall be able to break » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axas (*) mat’axan

2nd pers. gat’axas (*) gat’axan

3rd pers. at’axas (*) at’axan


(*) (ÇM)(AŞ) mat’axay, gat’axay, at’axay in assertive ;

mat’axas-i, gat’axas-i, at’axas-i in interrogative.



[B] ulun (aller, partir) : « he shall be able to go » etc


sg.  pl.

1st pers. malas malan

2nd pers. galas galan

3rd pers. alas alan


(Regional variants are no more described.)


Accent is on the penultimate in all forms of potential-optative mood.


« Potential future tense » « potential future-in-the-past » etc derive from potential-optative mood. See the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation ».

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.2.3. Potential-votive mood

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.2.3.1. (West)(FN)


In western dialects and in those of Fındıklı,


potential-votive mood = {potential simple perfective + -k’o (*)}.


(*) or, sometimes, {-k’ona} in Ardeşen and Fındıklı.


●●● In western dialects, the 1st and 2nd persons plural marker is postposed to {-k’o}. The 3rd person plural marker {-es} is circumposed to {-k’o} (or the latter is infixed within the former).


{-ek’es}(PZ)

{-ek’oy} ~ {-ek’os}(ÇM)(AŞ)


t’axums ~ t’axups (break) : « if I could break » etc


(PZ) sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axuk’o mat’axek’es

2nd pers. gat’axuk’o gat’axek’es

3rd pers. at’axuk’o at’axek’es



(ÇM)(AŞ) sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axuk’o mat’axek’oy (*)

2nd pers. gat’axuk’o gat’axek’oy (*)

3rd pers. at’axuk’o at’axek’oy (*)


(*) mat’axek’os-i, gat’axek’os-i, at’axek’os-i in interrogative.


● Variants : mat’axuk’ona, gat’axuk’ona etc in singular.



(FN) sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axuk’o mat’axesko

2nd pers. gat’axuk’o gat’axesko

3rd pers. at’axuk’o at’axesko


Variants : mat’axuk’ona, gat’axuk’ona etc.


Votive marker {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} is inaccented and do not change the place of accent of the word.


Accent is on the antepenultimate in all forms of potential-votive mood in western dialects and in those of Fındıklı.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.2.3.2. (AH)(HP)(ÇX)


In eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi,


Potentiel-votive mood

= {anteposed person marker II

+ pre-stem a-

+ stem of potential mood

+ optative marker -a

+ -t’-

+ suprapersonal past tense marker}


Sometimes the suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona}(AH) and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} (HP) are added for emphasis.


(AH)(HP)(ÇX)

sg.  pl.

1st pers. mat’axat’u mat’axat’es

2nd pers. gat’axat’u gat’axat’es

3rd pers. at’axat’u at’axat’es


[emphatic forms](AH) mat’axat’uk’o, mat’axat’uk’ona etc

[emphatic forms](HP) mat’axat’uk’on, mat’axat’uk’onna etc



The suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} are inaccentedand do not change the place of accent of the word.


In potential-votive mood, accent is on the syllable including the optative marker {-a-} in eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.3. Impersonal moods


The direct object of verb in impersonal moods is always 3rd person. And its number is never marked.


Sole non-causative actional verbs have impersonal moods.


●●● Intransitive verbs have impersonal moods as well as transitive verbs.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.3.1. Impersonal mood

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.3.1.1. Impersonal imperfective


Impersonal mood imperfective present tense =


{pre-stem i-

+ stem of the impersonal mood

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -en (< -er + -n)}


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal mood]


imxors (eat) işk’omen (West) it is edible

~ iç’k’omen (CentreEast)


t’axums (break) it’axen it can be broken



Stems of impersonal and indicatif moods are not always identical.


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal mood]


ibgars (weep) ibgarinen people are weeping

~ imgars ~ imgarinen


ulun (go) ilven (PZ) it is possible to go

~ ilen (AŞ)

~ ixtinen (FN-Ç’anapet, Ç’enneti)

~ ilen ~ ilinen (FN-Sumla)(AH)(HP)

~ ilen (ÇX)


it’urs (say)(West) izit’en (PZ) people say ; it is said

~ izit’t’en (ÇM)(AŞ)


zop’ons (say)(Centre) itkvinen (FN) people say ; it is said

~ itkven ~ itkvinen (AH-centre)(*)

~ it’k’vinen (AH-Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc)


tkumers (say)(HP) itkven ~ itkvinen (*) people say ; it is said


(*) In eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi, itkvinen means « people backbite ; people speak ill of him behind his back ». 


In impersonal mood imperfective present tense, accent is on the penultimate if the verb has no preverb (→ 11.7. ).


Impersonal mood imperfective past tense (ex. : ibgarinert’u : people were weeping) is described in the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation » (13.).


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.3.1.2. Impersonal perfective


Impersonal mood simple perfective =


{pre-stem i-

+ stem of impersonal mood

+ suprapersonal past tense marker -u}



[representative forms] [forms in impersonal simple perfective]


imxors (eat) işk’omu (West) people ate

~ iç’k’omu (CentreEast)


t’axums (break) it’axu it could be broken



Some multi-stemmed verbs in impersonal mood :


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal mood]


ibgars (weep) ibgarinu people wept

~ imgars ~ imgarinu


ulun (go) ilu (West)(AH)(HP) it has been possible to go

~ ixtinu (FN)(*)


it’urs (say)(West) izit’u (PZ) people said ; it was said

~ izit’t’u (ÇM)(AŞ)


zop’ons (say)(Centre) itkvinu (FN) people said ; it was said

~ itku ~ itkvinu (AH-centre)

~ it’k’vinu (AH-Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc)


tkumers (say)(HP) itku ~ itkvinu people said ; it was said


(*) Exceptional form ixtinu, with the stem {-xt- + -in-}, is observed only in Fındıklı. It is curious that this stem is not observed in Fındıklı in impersonal mood present tense form ilen.


In impersonal mood simple perfective, accent is on the penultimate if the verbe has no preverb.


Compound tenses of impersonal mood perfective (pluperfect and auditive past) are decscribed in the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation » (13.).


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.3.1.3. Actional verbs lacking impersonal moods


The pre-stem of the bipersonal verb u3’omers ~ u3’umers (tell to a determined person) is always {i-/u-}. As it is impossible to replace it by another vowel, this verb is lacking in impersonal moods (impersonal, impersonal-optative and impersonal-votive). It is only an example among many others.


A great number of verbs are thus lacking in moods other than indicative because of the restriction in the choice of pre-stems (→ 16.)

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.3.2. Impersonal-optative mood


Impersonal-optative mood =

{pre-stem i-

+ stem of impersonal mood

+ optative marker -a

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -s)}


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal-optative mood]


imxors (eat) işk’omas (West)(*) it shall be edible

~ iç’k’omas (CentreEast)(**)


(*) (ÇM)(AŞ) işk’omay in assertive ;

işk’omas-i ? in interrogative « shall it be edible ? » 

(**) also iç’k’omaz

[These regional variants will be no more described for each verb.]


t’axums (break) it’axas it shall be broken



Some multi-stemmed verbs in impersonal-optative mood :


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal-optative mood]


ibgars (weep) ibgarinas (West, Centre) people shall weep

~ imgars ~ imgarinas (HP)


ulun (go) ilvas (PZ) it shall be possible to go

~ ilas (ÇM)(AŞ)(AH)(HP)

~ ixtinas (FN)(*)


it’urs (say)(West) izit’as (PZ) it shall be said

~ izit’t’ay (ÇM)(AŞ)


zop’ons (say)(Centre) itkvinas (FN) it shall be said

itkvas ~ itkvinas (AH-centre)

~ it’k’vinas (AH-Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc)


tkumers (say)(HP) itkvas ~ itkvinas it shall be said



(*) Exceptional form ixtinas, with the stem {-xt- + -in-}, is observed only in Fındıklı. It is curious that this stem is not observed in Fındıklı in impersonal mood present tense form ilen.


In impersonal-optative mood, accent is on the penultimate if the verb has no preverb.


« Impersonal future tense » « impersonal future-in-the-past » etc derive from impersonal-optative mood. See the chapter « Verbs : Conjugation ».

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.3.3. Impersonal-votive mood

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11.5.3.3.1. (West)(FN)


In western dialects and in those of Fındıklı, impersonal-votive mood =


{Impersonal mood simple perfective + -k’o (*)}


(*) Sometimes {-k’ona} in Ardeşen and in Fındıklı.


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal-votive mood]


imxors (eat) işk’omuk’o (West) if it were edible

~ iç’k’omuk’o (FN)


t’axums (break) it’axuk’o if it could be broken


ibgars (weep) ibgarinuk’o if people wept


it’urs (say)(West) izit’uk’o (PZ) if it were said

~ izit’t’uk’o (ÇM)(AŞ)


zop’ons (say)(FN) itkvinuk’o (FN) if it were said



Votive marker {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} is inaccented and do not change the place of accent of the word.


In impersonal-votive mood, accent is always on the antepenultimate in western dialects and in those of Fındıklı.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

11.5.3.3.2. (AH)(East)


In estern dialects and in those of Arhavi, impersonal-votive mood =


{pre-stem i-

+ stem of impersonal mood

+ optative mood -a

+ -t’-

+ suprapersonal past tense marker -u}


Sometimes the suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona}(AH) and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} (HP) are added for emphasis.


[representative forms] [forms in impersonal-votive mood]


ipxors (eat) iç’k’omat’u if it were edible

~ imxors


t’axums (break) it’axat’u if it could be broken


ibgars (weep) ibgarinat’u (AH) if people wept

~ imgars ~ imgarinat’u (HP)


zop’ons (say)(AH) itkvat’u (AH-centre) if it were said

~ it’k’vat’u (AH-Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc)


tkumers (say)(HP) itkvat’u if it were said


The suffixes {-k’o} ~ {-k’ona} and {-k’on} ~ {-k’onna} are inaccented and do not change the place of accent of the word.


In potential-votive mood, accent is on the syllable including the optative marker {-a-} in eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.4. Experiential moods


Experiential moods express :

« state of person who has experience of action ».

It is not important when, how and how many times the action has been done.


These moods are always imperfective : they express a state (= experience) and not an action.


●●● Dative construction


In experiential moods, the subject is in dative case while the complement (direct object) is in absolutive case.


Sole non-causative actional verbs have experiential moods.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.4.1. Experiential mood

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.4.1.1. Experiential mood present tense


Experiential mood present tense =


(West) {anteposed person marker II

+ pre-stem i-/u-

+ stem of experiential mood

+ experiential mood marker -ap- (***)

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -un (< -ur + -n)}


●●● (***) Experiential mood marker {-ap-} is homophonous with

one of the suffixes forming causative stem (→ 12.5.)



(Centre, East) {anteposed person marker II

+ pre-stem i-/u-

+ stem of experiential mood

+ suprapersonal present tense marker -un (< -ur + -n)}


● In Fındıklı, western type forms are sometimes observed.



[A] imxors (eat)  : « it happened to me to eat » etc


sg. pl.

(West) 1st pers. mişk’omapun mişk’omapuran ~ mişk’omapunan

2nd pers. gişk’omapun gişk’omapuran ~ gişk’omapunan

3rd pers. uşk’omapun uşk’omapuran ~ uşk’omapunan


(CentreEast) miç’k’omun miç’k’omunan

giç’k’omun giç’k’omunan

uç’k’omun uç’k’omunan



[B] ulun (go) : « it happened to me to go »


(West) milvapun milvapuran ~ milvapunan

gilvapun gilvapuran ~ gilvapunan

ulvapun ulvapuran ~ ulvapunan


(CentreEast) mixtimun mixtimunan

gixtimun gixtimunan

uxtimun uxtimunan


In experiential mood present tense, accent is on the penultimate in singular forms, and on the antepenultimate in plural forms.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.4.1.2. Experiential mood past tense


[A] imxors (eat) : « it had happened to me to eat »


sg. pl.

(West) 1st pers. mişk’omapurt’u mişk’omapurt’es ~ mişk’omapurt’e(y)

2nd pers. gişk’omapurt’u gişk’omapurt’es ~ gişk’omapurt’e(y)

3rd pers. uşk’omapurt’u uşk’omapurt’es ~ uşk’omapurt’e(y)


(CentreEast) miç’k’omut’u miç’k’omut’ez ~ miç’k’omut’es

giç’k’omut’u giç’k’omut’ez ~ giç’k’omut’es

uç’k’omut’u uç’k’omut’ez ~ uç’k’omut’es



[B] ulun (go)  : « it had happened to me to go »


(West) milvapurt’u milvapurt’es ~ milvapurt’e(y)

gilvapurt’u gilvapurt’es ~ gilvapurt’e(y)

ulvapurt’u ulvapurt’es ~ ulvapurt’e(y)


(CentreEast) mixtimut’u mixtimut’ez ~ mixtimut’es

gixtimut’u gixtimut’ez ~ gixtimut’es

uxtimut’u uxtimut’ez ~ uxtimut’es


In experiential mood past tense, accent is always on the antepenultimate.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.5.4.1.3. Actional verbs lacking experiential moods


The pre-stem of the bipersonal verb u3’omers ~ u3’umers (tell to a determined person) is allways {i-/u-}. As it is impossible to replace it by another pre-stem, this verb is lacking in experiential moods (experiential and experiential-votive). It is only an example among many others.


A great number of Laz verbs are thus lacking in moods other than indicative because of the restriction in the choice of pre-stem (→ 16.)

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.4.2. Experiential-optative mood [empty subject]


Experiential-optative mood, possible in theory, is not attested in naturel conversations.

______________________________________________________________________


11.5.4.3. Experiential-votive mood


Experiential-votive mood = {experiential mood past tense + -k’o}


ulun (go)  : « if it had happened to me to eat »


(West) milvapurt’uk’o milvapurt’ek’es ~ milvapurt’ek’oy

gilvapurt’uk’o gilvapurt’ek’es ~ gilvapurt’ek’oy

ulvapurt’uk’o ulvapurt’ek’es ~ ulvapurt’ek’oy


(CentreEast) mixtimut’uk’o mixtimut’esko

gixtimut’uk’o gixtimut’esko

uxtimut’uk’o uxtimut’esko


In experiential-votive mood, accent is always on the fourth syllable from the end of the word.

______________________________________________________________________

 

11.6. pre-stems


11.6.1. {ø-}(absence of pre-stem)


11.6.2. {i-}

11.6.2.1. « Action for one’s own benefit » (marker of reflexive verb)

11.6.2.2. Impersonal mood marker

11.6.2.3. Function unknown can be replaced


11.6.3. {i-/u-}

11.6.3.1. « Action for the benefit of determined other person(s) »

11.6.3.2. Experiential mood marker

11.6.3.3. Function unknowncannot be replaced

11.6.3.4. Function unknowncan be replaced


11.6.4. {a-}

11.6.4.1. « Action taken by targeting determined other person(s) »

11.6.4.2. Potential mood marker

11.6.4.3. Function unknowncannot be replaced


11.6.5. {o-}

11.6.5.1. Transitivity marker

11.6.5.2. Function unknowncannot be replaced


Pre-stems are multi-functionary : they determine the relation between subject and complement ; they are mood markers ; or they are apparently ...... of no use.


Pre-stems are neutral concerbing the prosody. They can be accented or no according to the word configuration.

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.1. Pre-stem {ø-}(= absence of pre-stem)


Verbs without pre-stem express neutral actions which do not suppose any particular beneficiary.


Ex. :

mbonums (West) ~ bonums (Centre) he washes [body of animates]

ims (WestCentreHP) ~ mç’vips (ÇX) [it] rains

mtums (WestCentre) ~ mtups (East) (1) [it] snows

meçams (WestCentre) ~ meçaps (East)   (2) he gives

putxun (3) it flies

t’axums (WestCentre) ~ t’axups (East) he breaks


(1) mtun (AŞ- Dutxe)

(2) The morpheme {me-} of meçams ~ meçaps is a preverb (→ 11.7., 19.).

(3) cun (ÇM-M3’anu) ~ jun (AŞ-Jilen-Mzğem)


Absence of pre-stem is a mark of indicative mood. But there are also a great number of verbs having a pre-stem in indicative mood.

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.2. Pre-stem {i-}

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.2.1. « Action for one’s own benefit » (reflexive verb marker)


Reflexive verbs have the pre-stem {i-}.


[A]


imbonams (West) he washes himself

~ ibonams (Centre)

~ ibons (East) 


Xe imbonu. (West) He washed his (own) hands.

~ Xe ibonu. (CentreEst)


Xura vimbonare. (West) I shall wash my (own) body.

~ Xura bimbonare. (AŞ-east)

~ Xua bibonare.(Centre)

~ Xua vibonaminon. (HP)

~ Xua vibonaun. (ÇX)


(West) indicativeimperfectivepresent

subject

person and number of complement (here, direct object)

1. sg.

2. sg.

3. sg. 

1. pl.

2. pl.

3. pl.

1. sg. 

vimbonam






2. sg. 


imbonam





3. sg. 



imbonams




1. pl. 




vimbonamt



2. pl. 





imbonamt


3. pl. 






imbonaman


(AŞ-east) 1st pers. sg. bimbonam, 1st pers. pl. bimbonamt



(Centre) future

subject

person and number of complement

1. sg

2. sg.

3. sg. 

1. pl.

2. pl.

3. pl.

1. sg. 

bibonare






2. sg. 


ibonare





3. sg. 



ibonasen




1. pl. 




bibonaten



2. pl. 





ibonaten


3. pl. 






ibonanoren (*)


● (*)(FN) ibonanen ; (AH-Pilarget etc) ibonanon



(CentreEast) indicativesimple perfective

subject

person and number of complement

1. sg.

2. sg.

3. sg. 

1. pl.

2. pl.

3. pl.

1. sg. 

biboni ~ viboni






2. sg. 


iboni





3. sg. 



ibonu




1. pl. 




bibonit ~ vibonit



2. pl. 





ibonit


3. pl. 






ibones



[B]


niçams (WestCentre) ~ niçaps (East) : he gives as a pious act


● The morpheme {n-}, at the initial of niçams ~ niçaps, is a form of the preverb

{me-}(→ 11.7., 19.).


[C]


it’axams (WestCentre) ~ it’axaps (East) : he breaks his own object

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.2.2. Impersonnel mood marker (→ 11.5.3.)


Ex. :

işk’omen (West) ~ iç’k’omen (CentreEast) : it is edible

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.2.3. Function unknowncan be replaced


A great number of verbs, expressing neutral actions which do not suppose any particular beneficiary, have the pre-stem {i-} without any apparent function.


Ex. :

ibgars ~ ibgay ~ imgars he weeps

imt’en he runs away

incirs ~ inciy (West) he sleeps ;

(CentreEast) he lies down ; he sleeps

i3’k’en ~ i3’k’ers (CentreEast) he looks vaguely (*)


(*) cf. o3’k’en ~ o3’k’ers (CentreEast) he stares, he gazes


●●● The « pre-stem {i-} without apparent function » can be replaced by other pre-stems : for example by the impersonal mood marker {i-}.


●●● The « pre-stem {i-} without apparent function » has become today a « derivational prefix forming verbs from loan words ».


Ex. :

içalişams he works < Turkish çalış-

itelefonams he phones < Turkish telefon < French téléphone

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.3. Pre-stem {i-/u-}

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.3.1. « Action for the benefit of determined other person(s) »


Verbs having the pre-stem{i-/u-} express

« action taken for the benefit of determined other person(s) »

« action taken for the damage of determined other person(s) »

« action taken instead of determined other person »

« action taken for a object belonging to determined other person »


{i-} : if the beneficiary (or the victim) of action is 1st or 2nd person.

{u-} : if the beneficiary (or the victim) of action is 3rd person.



[A]


umbonams (West) he washes another person

~ ubonams (Centre)

~ ubons (East)  


Beres xepe umbonu. (PZ) He washed the hands of the child.

~ Bere xe umbonu. (ÇM)(AŞ)

~ Beres xe ubonu. (CentreEast)


Nana-şk’imik xepe mimbonu. (PZ) My mother washed my hands.

Nana-şk’imi xe mimbonu. (ÇM)(AŞ)

Nana-çkimik xe mibonu. (CentreEast)


Beres xura vumbonare. (PZ) I shall wash the body of the child.

~ Bere xura vumbonare. (ÇM)(AŞ-west)

~ Bere xura bumbonare. (AŞ-east)

~ Beres xua bubonare. (Centre)

~ Beres xua vubonaminon. (HP)

~ Beres xua vubonaun. (ÇX)


In the examples shown above, the beneficiary of action (= bere : child) is in dative case or in fused oblique case. The complement (direct object) (xura ~ xua : body, xepe ~ xe : hand) is in absolutive case.


Note for the word « hand » :


In the dialect of Pazar,

xepe = form common to the singular and the non-marked plural (→ 1.2.1.)

xepepe = form of the marked plural (→ 1.2.2.).


In all other dialects,

xe = form common to the singular and the non-marked plural

xepe = form of the marked plural



(West) indicativeimperfectivepresent : « you wash me » « I wash you » etc

subj.

person and number of beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg. 

2. pl.

3. sg.pl.

1. sg. 


gimbonam

gimbonamt

vumbonam (1)

2. sg. 

mimbonam

mimbonamt


umbonam

3. sg. 

mimbonams

mimbonaman

gimbonams

gimbonaman

umbonams

1. pl. 


gimbonamt

vumbonamt (2)

2. pl. 

mimbonamt


umbonamt

3. pl. 

mimbonaman

gimbonaman

umbonaman


(1)(AŞ-East) bumbonam

(2)(AŞ-East) bumbonamtu



(Centre) future : « you will wash me » « I shall wash you » etc

subj.

person and number of beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg. 

2. pl.

3.sg.pl.

1. sg. 


gibonare

gibonaten

bubonare

2. sg. 

mibonare

mibonaten


ubonare

3. sg. 

mibonasen

mibonanoren (1)

gibonasen

gibonanoren (2)

ubonasen

1. pl. 


gibonaten

bubonaten

2. pl. 

mibonaten


ubonaten

3. pl. 

mibonanoren (1)

gibonanoren (2)

ubonanoren (3)


(1) (FN) mibonanen ; (AH-Pilarget etc) mibonanon

(2) (FN) gibonanen ; (AH-Pilarget etc) gibonanon

(3) (FN) ubonanen ; (AH-Pilarget etc) ubonanon



(CentreEast) indicativesimple perfective : « you washed me » « I washed you » etc

subj.

person and number of beneficiary

1. sg.

1. pl.

2. sg. 

2. pl.

3. sg.pl.

1. sg. 


giboni

gibonit

buboni ~ vuboni

2. sg. 

miboni

mibonit


uboni

3. sg. 

mibonu

mibones

gibonu

gibones

ubonu

1. pl.


gibonit

bubonit ~ vubonit

2. pl. 

mibonit


ubonit

3. pl. 

mibones

gibones

ubones



[B]


nuçams (WestCentre) ~ nuçaps (East) : he gives instead of another person ;

he gives what belongs to another

person


● The morpheme {n-}, at the initial of nuçams ~ nuçaps, is a form of the preverb

{me-}(→ 11.7., 19.).


[C]


ut’axams (WestCentre) ~ ut’axaps (East) : he breaks instead of another person ;

he beaks what belongs to another

person

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.3.2. Experiential mood marker (→ 11.5.4.)


Ex. : uşk’omapun (West) it happened to him to eat

~ uç’k’omun (CentreEast) 

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.3.3. Function unknowncannot be replaced


A part of stative verbs have always the pre-stem {i-/u-} without apparent function (→ 12.2.).


Ex. : uşk’un (West) ~ uçkin (CentreEast) he knows

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.3.4. Function unknowncan be replaced


[A]


The multi-stemmed intransitive verb ulun (go) and all verbs being derived from it have the pre-stem {i-/u-} without apparent function before their imperfective stem in indicative mood.


vulur ~ bulur I go

ulur you go

ulun he goes


These verbs have potential, impersonal and experiential moods. Each mood has its specific pre-stem.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[B]


In western dialects, the pre-stem {i-/u-} without apparent function is observed before the stem of the verb udums (shut [one’s eyes]) in indicative mood (*).


vudum ~ budum I shut (my eyes) [imperfective present tense]

udum you shut (your eyes)

udums ~ uduy he shuts (his eyes)


vudvi ~ budvi I shut (my eyes) [simple perfective]

udvi you shut (your eyes)

udu he shut (his eyes)


This verb has potential, impersonal and experiential moods. Each mood has its specific pre-stem.


(*) The verb odums ~ odumers corresponds to it in central and eastern dialects. The stem of this verb has the pre-stem {ø-}. The morpheme {o-}, at the initial of the word, is a preverb very rare (→ 19.) which is not observed in western dialects.


obdum ~ obdumer I shut (my eyes)

odum ~ odumer you shut (your eyes)

odums ~ odumers he shuts (his eyes)


obdvi I shut (my eyes)

odvi you shut (your eyes)

odu he shut (his eyes)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[C]


The pre-stem {i- /u-} without apparent function is observed also before the stem of indicadive mood of the verb meaning « run » in most of dialects (except Arhavi).


(West) vuk’ap’am ~ buk’ap’am I run

uk’ap’am you run

uk’ap’ams he runs


(FN) oxobut’k’va3am

oxut’k’va3am

( oxut’k’va3ams) ~ oxut’k’va3un (*)


(*) It happens sometimes that the post-stem is not identical in all persons

in a dialect.


● The morpheme {oxo-} ~ {ox-}, at the initial of the word, is a preverb

(→ 11.7., 19.).


(AH) p’t’aik’om

t’aik’om

t’aik’oms


(HP) bunk’ap’um ~ bunk’ap’up ~ bunk’ap’am ~ bunk’ap’ap

unk’ap’um ~ uk’ap’up ~ unk’ap’am ~ unk’ap’ap

unk’ap’ums ~ uk’ap’ups ~ unk’ap’ams ~ unk’ap’aps

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.4. Pre-stem {a-}

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.4.1. « Action taken by targeting determined other person(s) »


The pre-stem {a-} forms indirect transitive verbs expressing « action taken by targeting determined other person(s) ».


Few examples are observed.


Ex. :

abgars he weeps by targeting a determined person

(cf. ibgars : he weeps without targeting anybody)


gvaben (1) (a liquid matter) is sprinkled on a determined person

~ gaben (2)

(cf gobams : he sprinkles [a liquid] without targeting anybody) (3)


(1)(2)(3) The preverb {go-}(→ 11.7., 19.) takes

the form {gv-} before {a-} in western dialects ;

the form {g-} before {a-} in central and eastern dialects ;


The preverb {go-} and the pre-stem {o-}(→ 11.6.5.)

are fused giving the form {go-}.


The « targeted person » is in dative case.


Berek nana-muşis abgars. (PZ) The child weeps (cries) by targeting his mother.

~ Bere nana-muşi abgay. (ÇM)(AŞ)

~ Berek nana-muşiz abgars. (FN)(AH)

~ Berek nana-muşiz namgars. (*)(HP)


(*) The morpheme {n-}, at the initial of namgars, is a form of the preverb {me-}(→ 11.7., 19.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.4.2. Potential mood marker (→ 11.5.2.)


Ex. :

aşk’omen (West) « he can eat » or « he eats involuntarily »

~ aç’k’omen (CentreEast)

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.4.3. Function unknowncannot be replaced


A certain number of stative verbs, evolutional verbs and actional verbs have the stem always preceded by the pre-stem {a-} without clear function.


Ex. : nagen (*) he meets somebody unexpectedly


(*) The morpheme {n-}, at the initial of nagen, is a form of the preverb {me-}(→ 11.7., 19.).


These verbs have neither potential, impersonal and experiential moods nor corresponding causative verb.

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.5. Pre-stem {o-}


See homophonous morphemes :


● One of affirmation profixes (→ 11.8.2.1.)

● Absence marker of preverb at the initial of verbal nouns (→ 15.)

● Absence marker of preverb at the initial of verbal adjectives (→ 15.)

● A rare preverb observed in central and eastern dialects (→ 19.)

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.5.1. Transitivity marker


[A]


« Transitive verbs being derived from intransitive verb » have the pre-stem {o-} if they express an action which has no determined beneficiary.


ogzalams


(West) he makes walk ; he makes go, he makes leave, he sends

(cf igzars ~ igzalams : he walks ; he goes, he leaves)


(CentreEast) he makes go, he makes leave, he sends

(cf igzals : he goes, he leaves)

oncirams


(West) he makes sleep

(cf incirs : he sleeps)

(CentreEast) he makes lie down ; he makes sleep

(cf incirs : he lies down ; he sleeps)


● All transitive verbs are bipersonal in Laz. (→ 12.4., 13.).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[B]


Causative verbs (→ 12.5.) have the pre-stem {o-} if they expess an action without determined beneficiary.


obgarinams (WestCentre) he makes weep (ibgars ~ imgars : he weeps)

~ omgarinaps (HP)

omt’inams he makes run away (imt’en : he runs away)

oputxinams he makes fly (putxun : he flies)

ot’axapams (*) he makes break (t’axums : he breaks)


(*)(AH) In the dialects of Pilarget, Sidere, Jin-Napşit etc in Arhavi, the post-stem (→ 11.1.) is regularly {-em} if the causative marker is {-ap-}.


Ex. : ot’axapems


Causative verbs are always bipersonal (→ 12.5., 13.).


(West) (FN) In western dialects and in those of Fındıklı, the post-stem ssems to be always {-am} if the pre-stem is {o-}. Further researches are necessary in order to confirm (or deny) this observation.


●●● The pre-stems {o-} and {i-/u-} are sole compatible with causative verbs and « transitive verbs being derived from intransitive verb ». Consequently, the latters do not have potential, impersonal and experiential moods.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[C]


There are some transitive verbs, not derived from intransitive verb, which have the pre-stem {o-} without apparent function. (***)


eyevoşk’omam (PZ)(ÇM)(AŞ-west) I eat besides (next dish)

~ eyeboşk’omam (AŞ-east)

~ eyeboç’k’omam (FN)

~ ebopxor/eboç’k’omam (AH)

~ gebopxor/geboç’k’omam (AH)

~ gevomxor/gevoç’k’omap (HP)

~ gevoç’k’omap (ÇX)


cevobazgi ~ cebobazgi (West) I trampled

~ gebobaz*gi (Centre)

~ gevobazgi (East)


Ex. : oxmarams (West)(*) he uses


(*) The corresponding verb in central and eastern dialects has the pre-stem {i-} without

apparent function.


ixmarams (FN)(AH) he uses

~ ixmars (AH- Jin-Napşit)

~ ixmars, ixmaraps (HP)


●●● (***) These verbs can take other pre-stems forming different moods.


[potential]

eyemaşk’omen I can eat besides (the next dish)

~ eyemaç’k’omen

~ emaç’k’omen

~ gemaç’k’omen


cemazgu I trampled invouontarily

~ gemaz*gu


maxmaren I can use


[impersonal]

eyişk’omen people eat it besides

~ eyiç’k’omen


cibazgu people trampled involuntarily

~ geyibaz*gu


ixmaren ~ ixmarinen (AŞ) it can be used

~ ixmaren (AH)

______________________________________________________________________


11.6.5.2. Function unknowncannot be replaced


Some intransitive verbs have the pre-stem {o-} without apparent function.


colams (West)(1)(*)  it falls vertically


comç’ims (West)(1) it leaks from the roof

~ gyomç’ims (CentreEast)(2)


(*) The corresponding verb in central and eastern dialects is gelams with pre-stem {ø-}.


(1) The morpheme {c-}, at the initial of the word, is the variant before vowel of the preverb {ce-}.


(2) The morpheme {gy-} is the variant before /a/, /o/, /u/ of the preverb {ge-}.


These intransitive verbs have neither potential, impersonal and experiential moods nor corresponding causative verb.

______________________________________________________________________


11.7. Preverbs


Most of preverbs (*) indicate in Laz orientation of mouvement. Many Laz call them « orientation affixes ». This term is not used in the present study because all preverbs do not indicate an orientation. Some of them express notions like « together » or « immediately after ». Some of them have no apparent function.


(*) There are nearly fifty preverbs in Laz.


We show here some of them most frequently used. See the chapter of « Preverbs » (→ 19.).


Preverbs are prefixed to anteposed person markers. It causes important phonetic change (elision, apparition of epenthetic semi-vowel, alternation of consonants etc). Many regional varieties are observed.


■■■ In verbs beginning by a preverb, the last vowel of the preverb is accented (1)(2). In case of elision of this vowel, the next vowel is accented.


(1) In Laz, there can be more than one accented syllable in a verb complex. In future tense and future-in-the-past tense, for example, the optative marker {-a-} is accented as well as the last vowel of preverb.


(2) Preverbs are inaccented if they are prefixed to participles (→ 14.).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[A] {me-} [1] « going away from the place where the speaker is now »

[2] (function unknown)


 [1] mevulur ~ mebulur (West)(FN) I come toward you

(AH)(East) I go


nulur (*) (West)(FN) you come back where you are now

(AH)(East) you go


nulun (*) (West)(FN) he comes toward you

(AH)(East) he goes


(*) {n-} before vowel in all dialects.


 [2] meşonums he hopes

~ meşvens

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[B] {mo-} «  coming to the place where the speaker is now »


movulur ~ mobulur I come back here

mulur (*) you come toward me

mulun (*) he comes toward me


(*){m-} before /u/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[C] {e-}(WestCentre) « vertically above, upward, to the top »

~ {ye-}(East)

evulur ~ ebulur (WestCentre) I go up vertically

~ yevulur (East)


eyulur (West) (1) you go up vertically

~ yulur (CentreEast)(2)


eyulun (West) (1) he goes up vertically

~ yulun (CentreEast)(2)


(1) In western dialects : {ey-} before all vowels.

(2) In centrql and eastern dialects: {y-}before /a/, /o/ and /u/ ; {e-} before /i/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[D] {ela-}(WestCentreHP) ~ {ila-}(ÇX)

[1] « slantwise upward »

[2] « aside ; on a corner »


[1] elevulur ~ elebulur (1) I go up slantwise

~ ilevulur (1)


elulur (2) you go up slantwise

~ ilulur (2)


elulun (2) he goes up slantwise

~ ilulun (2)

(1) {ele-}{ile-} before person marker consonant

(2) {el-}{il-} before /i/, /u/.

[2] elaxedun ~ ilaxedun he sits down on a corner

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[E] {ce-}(West) « vertically downward, to the bottom »

~ {ge-}(CentreEast)


cevulur ~ cebulur I go down vertically

~ gebulur ~ gevulur


culur (West) (1) you go down vertically

~ gyulur (CentreEast)(2)


culun (West) (1) he goes down vertically

~ gyulun (CentreEast)(2)


(1) In western dialects, {c-} before all vowels.

(2) In central and eastern dialects, {gy-} before /a/, /o/, /u/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[F] {dolo-} « downward in a deep place »


delevulur (PZ)(1) I go down in a deep place

~ dolovulur ~ dolobulur


delulur (PZ)(2) you go down in a deep place

~ dolulur (3)

~ dululur (4)


delulun (PZ)(2) he goes down in a deep place

~ dolulun (3)

~ dululun (4)


(1) in Pazar, {dele-} before person marker consonant.

(2) in Pazar, {del-} before /i/, /u/.

(3) in ÇM, AŞ, FN, AH, HP, {dol-} before /i/, /u/.

(4) in Çxala and Akçakoca, {dul-} before /u/.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[G] {ama-} « in, into, to the interior »


amavulur ~ amabulur I go in

amulur (*) you go in

amulun (*) he goes in


(*) {am-} before /i/, /o/, /u/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[H] {gama-} « out of, outside, to the exterior »


gamavulurt ~ gamabulurt we go out

gamulurt (*) you go out

gamuluran ~ gamulunan (*) they go out


(*) {gam-} before /i/, /o/, /u/.


● A lot of regional variants are observed :

gamavulurte, gamabulurtu ; gamulvan, gamulan etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[I] {go-} [1] « all around »

[2] (function unknown)


[1] govulur ~ gobulur I ramble about

gulur (*)  you ramble about

gulun (*) he rambles about


(*) {g-} before /u/.


[2] gomaşinen I remember

gogaşinen you remember

gvaşinen (*) he remembers

~ gaşinen (*)


(*) Before /a/,

{gv-} in western dialects,

{g-} in central and eastern dialects.

It is an evolutional verb (→ 12.3., 13.3.).

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[J] {koşka-}(West) « between, among »

~{goşa-}(CentreEast)


koşkapxedur I sit down between

~ goşapxedur


koşkovulur (1) I pass through an interval

~ koşkobulur

~ goşobulur

~ goşovulur


koşk’ulun (2) he passes through an interval

~ goşulun


(1) {koşko-}~{goşo-} before person marker consonant.

(2) {koşk’-}~{goş-} before /i/, /u/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[K] {oko-}[1] « together »


okovibgart we weep together

~ okobibgart

~ okovimgart


ok’ibgaran (*) they weep together

~ ok’imgaran


okovulurt ~ okobulurt we come together


ok’ulun (*) (water) joins ; (two rivers) join


(*) {ok’-} before /i/, /u/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[L] {koko-}(PZ) « dividing in two »

~ {oko-}[2](AŞCentreEast)


kokop’k’vatum I cut in two

~ okop’k’vatum


(*) beres toma kok’untxozams he (she) wears child’s hair in two braids

~ bere toma ok’untxozay

~ beres (n)toma ok’untxozams

~ beres mtoma ok’untxozaps


(*) {kok’-}~{ok’} before /i/, /u/.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[M] {do-}(***) (function unknown)


dopxedur I sit down


doxedi ! sit down !


deviguram (PZ)(1) I learn

~ doviguram

~ dobiguram

~ dovigurap


diguram ~ digurap (2) you learn


(1) in Pazar, {de-} before person marker consonant followed by

the pre-stems {i-} or {i-/u-}.

(2) {d-} before /i/, /u/.


■ In the verb “learn”, the preverb and the pre-stem are accented equally.

doviguram, dobiguram etc


(***) Homophonous with the affirmation profix {do-}(→ 11.8.2.3.).

______________________________________________________________________


11.8. Affirmation and Negation


11.8.1. Non-marked affirmation and négation markers 

11.8.2. Affirmation profix

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1. Non-marked affimation and negation markers


Laz verbs are affirmative in the absence of negation marker (*).


(*) See the next subject (11.8.2.) for the marked affirmation.


There is no opposition between affirmation and negation in imperative, prohibitive (→ 11.5.1.5.) and prohibito-optative moods(→ 11.5.1.6.).


Negation markers are prefixes. They are anteposed to preverbs.


11.8.1.1. var- ~ va-

11.8.1.2. vati + optative (PZ)

11.8.1.3. vat’o + optative (AŞ)

11.8.1.4. vati ~ varti (FN)

11.8.1.5. vati ~ varti (AH)

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1.1. var- ~ va-


The negation marker var- ~ va- is used in all moods having opposition between affirmation and negation. However, the use of negation is rather rare in optative moods.


The form var- is observed very often before vowel, while the variant va- is frequent before consonant.


In despite of the habit of a great number of Laz, the negation marker var- ~ va- is written in this study systematically with a hyphen for following reasons :


[1] As a verb complex can be constructed frequently by more than ten affixes in Laz, it is preferable to detach certain elements which are morphologically independent. It facilitates greatly the lecture.


[2] There are some verbal forms beginning by /va-/ (= 1st person marker {v-} + pre-stem {a-}) in western and eastern dialects. The principle of « detaching the negation marker var- ~ va- » permits to avoid confusion and facilitates the lecture.


[3] By writing, for example, var-on (West : « there is not ») and va-ren (Centre, East : «there is not »), it is possible to recognize immediately to which morpheme the phoneme /r/ belongs.



■■■ Negation markers are always accented. In Laz, there can be two or more accents in a verb complex.



va-çams he does not give to eat

va-çu he did not give to eat

var-imt’en he does not run away

var-imt’u he did not run away

var-imxors ~ var-ipxors he does not eat

~ va-ç’k’omups (ÇX)

va-şk’omu ~ va-ç’k’omu he did not eat

va-şk’omasere (PZ-westCentre) he will not eat

~ va-şk’omasen

~ va-ç’k’omasen

~ va-ç’k’omasinon (HP)

~ va-ç’k’omasun (ÇX)

va-putxun he does not fly

va-putxu he did not fly

va-mç’ims it does not rain; it is not raining

~ va-mç’vips (ÇX)


va-movulur I do not come back here

~ va-mobulur

va-gamavulur I do not go out

~ va-gamabulur

va-ok’ibgares they did not weep together

~ va-ok’imgares

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1.2. vati + optative mood (PZ)


The form {vati + optative mood}, observed in Pazar, is equivalent to the future tense negative.


vati vida (= va vidare) I will not go

vati meft’a (= va meft’are) I will not come toward you

vati şk’omas (= va şk’omasere) he will not eat

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1.3. vat’o + optative mood (AŞ)


The form {vat’o + optative mood} is observed in Ardeşen. It means « it is probable that + future tense negative ».


vat’o vida ~ vat’o bida it is probable that I will not go

vat’o moft’a it is probable that I will not come back here

vat’o şk’omay it is probable that he will not eat

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1.4. vati ~ varti (*) (FN)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[A] (FN-Sumla)


Mp’olişa varti memalasen. (*) It is probable that I will not be able to come

(see you) to Istanbul


(*) This example has been given, with its translation into Turkish, by Mr. Nurdoğan Demir Abaşişi, native of Sumla.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[B-1] (FN-Ç’urç’ava)


- Nana-çkimi, baba komoxtu-i, p’ea ?(*)(1) Mammy, did Daddy come by any chance ?

- Varti moxtu ! I do not think (he came) !


(*) The morpheme {ko-}, at the initial of komoxtu (he came), is an affirmation

profixe (→ 11.8.2.).



[B-2] (FN-Ç’urç’ava)


- Si ç’andaşa idare-i ? (2) Will you go to the wedding dinner ?

- Varti bidare ! I do not think (I will go) !


(1)(2) The two examples shown above have been given, with their translation into Turkish, by Mr. Hasan Uzunhasanoğlu, inhabitant of Ç’urç’ava. Hyphen is not used in the original version : he writes « Nana çkimi, baba komoxtu i ... » .

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.1.5. vati ~ varti (AH)


Varti bidare. I do not think I will go.

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.2. Affirmation profixes


11.8.2.1. {o-}(*)

11.8.2.2. {menda-/minda-} (1)

11.8.2.3. {do-}

11.8.2.4. {ko-/ho-} (2)


(*) except in Çxala.


(1){minda-} in Çxala, {menda-} everywhere else.

(2) (West)(Centre) {ko-}, (East) {ko-} ~ {ho-}.


{o-} and {menda-/minda-} are observed at the initial of very few verbs.


{o-}{menda-/minda-}{do-} are incompatible with preverbs : they are prefixed only to verbs without preverb.


{ko-} is observed at the initial of

« actional verbs beginnig by a preverb » and

« verb of existence and stative verbs without preverb »


●●● Affirmation profixes are never used in adnominal and nominal clauses (→ 17.).


They are never prefixed to verbal nouns (→ 15.)

and participles (→ 14.).


■■■ Affirmation profixes are always accented. The disyllabic profix {menda-/minda-} is accented on the last syllable.


In case of elision of the last vowel of profixes {menda-/minda-}{do-}{ko-}, the next vowel is accented.

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.2.1. Affirmation profix {o-}


See homophonous morphemes :


● One of pre-stems (→ 11.6.5.)

Absence marker of preverb at the initial of verbal nouns (→ 15.)

Absence marker of preverb at the initial of verbal adjectives (→ 15.)

● A rare preverb observed in central and eastern dialects (→ 19.)


This affirmation profix is not observed in the dialects of Çxala.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.8.2.1.1. List of verbs taking the profix {o-}


Verbs taking the affirmation profix {o-} can be classified into three groups according to their morphology, use and distribution.


[A] Those which are observed in all dialects (except those of Çxala).

The pre-stem is {ø-} or « {i-} without apparent function ».


[representative forms] [translation]

imxors ~ ipxors eat

çams ~ çaps give to eat


ç’opums ~ ç’opups catch, capture

iç’open be caught, be captured (*)


şums ~ şups drink


(*) The verb iç’open is translated into English by a verb in passive voice. It does

not mean that the passive voice exists in Laz. The verb is intransitive in Laz.



[B] Those which are observed in all dialects (except those of Çxala).

The pre-stem is

« {i-} = impersonal mood marker » or

« {i-} = reflexive verb marker » or

« {i-/u-} = marker of « transitive verb with action for the benefit of determined other person(s) »


int’alen mix, mingle [reflexive]

unt’alams ~ unt’alaps mix, mingle [transitive, action for another person]


işk’omen be eaten (*)

~ iç’k’omen


uşk’omams eat what belongs to another person

~ uç’k’omams ~ uç’k’omaps


uç’opams ~ uç’opaps capture for another person ;

capture what belongs to another person


uşvams ~ uşvaps drink what belongs to another person


(*) The Laz verb is in impersonal mood.



[C] Those taking the profix {o-} only in western dialects.


ç’ums burn [transitive]

uç’ums burn what belongs to another person

iç’ven burn, blaze [intransitive]


udums (West)(1) shut (one’s eyes)


inor- (West)(*) [meaning unknown](*)


(*) This verb is observed only in indicative mood simple perfective 1st person singular preceded by the profix {o-} in refrains of love songs (→ 11.8.2.1.2.C-5). Some Laz assert that it means « burn out and become ashes ». But, it is far from being approuved unanimously.


Indicative mood imperfective present tense 3rd person singular of this verb could have forms like *inors, *inoren, *inorams etc. None of them is attested. The hyphen of the « representative form» indicates that the imperfective forms are unknown.


(1) The corresponding verb in central and eastern dialects is described in the next subject (→ 11.8.2.1.2.C-4).


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


11.8.2.1.2. Use of affirmation profix {o-}


[A] Verbs which are observed in all dialects (except those of Çxala) with the profix {o-}. The pre-stem is {ø-} or « {i-} without apparent function ».


Verbs of this group take the profix only in perfective aspect. We show here the form of 1st person singular.


imxors ~ ipxors pşk’omi ~ p’ç’k’omi I ate (*)

opşk’omi ~ op’ç’k’omi of course I ate


[(ÇX) kop’ç’k’omi]


pşk’omare ~ p’ç’k’omare I shall eat

opşk’omare ~ op’ç’k’omare of course I shall eat


[(ÇX) kop’ç’k’omaun]


(*) Also « I have eaten » in some context.


çams ~ çaps pçi I gave to eat

opçi


[(ÇX) kopçi]


ç’opums ~ ç’opups p’ç’opi I caught, I captured

op’ç’opi


[(ÇX) kop’ç’opi]


iç’open viç’opi ~ biç’opi I am caught, I am captured

oviç’opi ~ obiç’opi


[(ÇX) koviç’opi]


şums ~ şups pşvi I drank

opşvi


[(ÇX) kopşvi]



[B] Verbs which are observed in all dialects (except those of Çxala) with the profix {o-}.

The pre-stem is

« {i-} = impersonal mood marker » or

« {i-} = reflexive verb marker » or

« {i-/u-} = marker of « transitive verb with action for the benefit of determined

other person(s) »


Verbs of this group take the profix in perfective and imperfective aspects.


int’alert’u (1) they were mingling [reflexive]

oint’alert’u (*)(1) they were mingling altogether [reflexive]


[(ÇX) kint’ale(r)t’u]


(*) Variants : oyint’alert’u ~ oynt’alert’u


(1) The forms int’alert’u and oint’alert’u are 3rd person singular. If the plural

subject is inanimate, the verbs remain often in singular in Laz.


mint’alu he mixed for me ; he mixed what belongs to me

omint’alu


[(ÇX) komint’alu]


işk’omu ~ iç’k’omu people ate it

oişk’omu ~ oiçk’omu (*)


[(ÇX) kiçk’omu]


(*) Variants : oyişk’omu ~ oyşk’omu; oyiç’k’omu ~ oyç’k’omu


gişk’omams he eats what belongs to you

~ giç’k’omams

~ giç’k’omaps

ogişk’omams

~ ogiç’k’omams

~ ogiç’k’omaps


[(ÇX) kogiç’k’omaps]


vuç’opi ~ buç’opi I caught what belongs to him

ovuç’opi ~ obuç’opi 


[(ÇX) kovuç’opi]


mişvams ~ mişvaps he drinks what belongs to me

omişvams ~ omişvaps


[(ÇX) komişvaps]


omişu ~ omişşu (AŞ) he drank what belongs to me


●●● In 3rd person, the forms like *ouç’opu, *ouşk’omams ~ *ouç’k’omams ~ *ouç’k’omaps, *ouşvaps etc are never observed. Only forms like uç’opu (he caught for another person), uşk’omams ~ uç’k’omams ~ uç’k’omaps (he eats what belongs to another person), uşvams ~ uşvaps (he drinks what belongs to another person) are attested. (***)


■■■ (***) As the accent can be on the initial or penultimate in polysyllabic forms like uç’opu and uç’k’omams, it is possible to presume that the profix {o-} and the pre-stem {u-} fuse into one phoneme /u/ when they are in contact.



[C] Verbs taking the profix {o-} only in western dialects.


[C-1] ç’ums (burn [transitive])


p’ç’vi I burned [transitive]

op’ç’vi (*)


(*) In central and eastern dialects (including those of Çxala), affirmation profix

{do-} is attached to this verb : dop’ç’vi.


[C-2] uç’ums (burn [transitive] for another person)


miç’u he burned what belongs to me

omiç’u (*)


(*) (Centre, East)(including ÇX) domiç’u

[C-3] iç’ven (burn [intransitive])


viç’vi ~ biç’vi I got burnt

oviç’vi ~ obiç’vi (*)


(*) (Centre, East)(including ÇX) dobiç’vi ~ doviç’vi


[C-4] udums (West)(shut [one’s eyes]) (1)(2)


vudvi ~ budvi I shut (my eyes)

ovudvi ~ obudvi


(1) (FN)(AH)(HP) The verb odums ~ odumers, which corresponds to it in central and eastern dialects, begins by the preverb {o-}(→ 19.) (*). Preverbs are compatible with negation markers.


(FN) (AH-centre)

obdum, odum, odums ... ; var-obdum, var-odum, var-odums ...

obdvi, odvi, odu ... ; var-obdvi, var-odvi, var-odu ...


(AH- Pilarget etc) (HP)

obdumer, odumer, odumers ... ; var-obdumer, var-odumer, var-odumers ...

obdvi, odvi, odu ... ; var-obdvi, var-odvi, var-odu ...


(*) The preverb {o-} has no apparent function.

Another case of this preverb is observed, in central and eastern dialects, in the

verb opşams (fill up).


This preverb is not attested in western dialects.


(2)(ÇX) In the dialects of Çxala, the corresponding verb is odvars. It has no preverb and no affirmation profix. Its conjugation is as follows.


vodvar, odvar, odvars ... ; var-vodvar, var-odvar, var-odvars ...

vodvi, odvi, odu ... ; var-vodvi, var-odvi, var-odu ...



[C-5] inor- (West) [meaning unknown]


ovinori ~ obinori (1) [meaning unknown]


(1) This form appears only in the expression “oviç’vi do ovinori ~ obiç’vi do obinori” which is used frequently in love songs.

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.2.2. Affirmation profix {menda-/minda-}


Variants :


mend-/mind- : before {anteposed person marker ø- + pre-stem}

mende-/minde- : before {anteposed person marker consonant + pre-stem}


Affirmation profix {menda-/minda-} is prefixed only to verbs meaning « go » « take away » « carry away » « send » and « look at (from afar)».


It is used in perfecive and imperfective aspects. It is observed also in impersonal mood.


ulun, mendulun, mindulun he goes


cf var-ulun he does not go


idu, mendaxt’u (West) he went, he left

~ idu, mendaxtu (CentreHP)

idu, mindaxtu (ÇX)


cf var-idu


ilven, mendilven it is possible to go

~ ilen, mendilen

~ ilinen, mendilinen

ilen, mindilen


cf var-ilven ~ var-ilen ~ var-ilinen it is not possible to go


uğams, menduğams (West) he takes [inanimate obj.] away (1)

~ umers, mendumers (Centre)(HP)

~ umars, mindumars (ÇX)


uyonu, menduyonu (WestCentre) he took [animate obj.] with him (2)

~ ux’onu, mendux’onu (HP)

~ ux’onu, mindux’onu (ÇX)


puci vupini, puci mendevupini (West) I took cows with me (3)

~ puci bupini, puci mendebupini (West)(FN)


gincğona, mendegincğona, mindegincğona let me send you (inanimate obj.)


oşk’u, mendoşk’u, mindoşk’u he sent [animate obj.]


menda3’k’edu, minda3’k’edu he looked from a distance



(1) In western dialects, menduğams means also « he takes away by force ».


(2) In western dialects, menduyonu means also « he carries off by force ».


(3) Vupini ~ bupini means generally « I spread ». The verb does not mean « take domestic animals with one » in eastern dialects and in those of Arhavi.

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.2.3. Affirmation profix {do-}


See homophonous preverb (→ 11.7.M, 19.).


Variants :


Before {anteposed person marker ø- + pre-stem}


if the pre-stem is {i-} or {i-/u-},

d- : in all dialects ;


if the pre-stem is {o-},

dv- : (ÇM)(AŞ)(ÇX)

d- : (PZ)(Centre)(HP)


if the pre-stem is {a-},

dv- : (West)(ÇX)

d- : (Centre)(HP).


Before {anteposed person marker consonant + pre-stem},


(PZ) de- : if the pre-stem is {i-} or {i-/u-},

do- : if the pre-stem is {a-} or {o-} ;


(Everywhere else) do- : in all cases



If the pre-stem of the verb is {ø-}, the profix {do-} is observed only in perfective.


If the pre-stem of the verb is other than {ø-}, the profix {do-} is observed also at the initial of imperfective forms.


The form {do- + indicative mood imperfective present tense} expresses iterative action.



ixenams (WestCentre) ~ ixvenaps (East) he is doing for himself

dixenams (WestCentre) ~ dixvenaps (East) he does often for homself


ixenu (WestCentre) ~ ixvenu (East) he did for himself

dixenu (WestCentre) ~ dixvenu (East) of course he did (for himself)


uxenams (WestCentre) ~ uxvenaps (East) he is doing for another person

duxenams (WestCentre) ~ duxvenaps (East) he does often for another person


uxenu (WestCentre) ~ uxvenu (East) he did for another person

duxenu (WestCentre) ~ duxvenu (East) of course he did (for another person)


puci unç’valams (West) he is milking a cow for another person

puci dunç’valams (West)  he milks often a cow for another person


cf puci nç’valums (he milks a cow [without any particular beneficiary])


● In central and eastern dialects, the verb meaning « milk » is not observed

with affirmation profix {do-}.


Cf « milk » : munç’valums (AH), nç’valums ~ nç’valups (HP) ;

puciz muzdams (FN), puciz muzdoms (AH), puciz muzdaps (HP).


{m-} is the variant before vowel of the preverb {mo-}. Affirmation

profixes are incompatible with preverbs.



p’t’axi, dop’t’axi I broke


vu3’vi, devu3’vi (PZ) I told him

~ vu3’vi, dovu3’vi (ÇM)(AŞ-west)(HP)(ÇX)

~ bu3’vi, dobu3’vi (AŞ-east)(FN)(AH)

______________________________________________________________________


11.8.2.4. Affirmation profix {ko-}


Free variant {ho-} is sometimes observed in eastern dialects.


Variant before vowel : {k-} before all vowels in all dialects.



[A] at the initial of the verb of existence (→ 12.1.) (imperfective)


kon (West) it exists  cf var-on (it does not exist)

~ koren (Centre) cf va-ren

~ koyen (CentreEast) cf va-yen



[B] at the initial of the verb « be worth » (→ 12.2.) (imperfective)


ğirs, koğirs it is worth



[C] at the initial of stative verbs (→ 12.2.) (imperfective)


pxer, kopxer I am sitting


mişk’un, komişk’un (West) I know

~ miçkin, komiçkin (CentreEast)



[D] at the initial of actional verbs (→ 12.4.) beginning by a preverb


[D-1] in perfective aspect


amaxt’u, kamaxt’u (West) he entered

~ amaxtu, kamaxtu (CentreEast)


dopxedi, kodopxedi I sat down


dololu, kodololu it fell into a deep place


elaxedu, kelaxedu he sat on a corner


moxt’i ! , komoxt’i ! (West) come !

~ moxti ! , komoxti ! (CentreEast)



[D-2] sometimes in imperfective aspect expressing iterative action (*)


goimsk’vanams ~ goimskvanams he is making himself beautiful,

she is making herself beautiful

kogoimsk’vanams ~ kogoimskvanams he makes often himself beautiful,

she makes often herself beautiful


●●● (*) All verbs do not have this use .

______________________________________________________________________


11.9. Interrogation


11.9.1. Interrogation with non-marked verb

11.9.2. Interrogation marker = postfix {-i}

______________________________________________________________________


11.9.1. Interrogation with non-marked verb


In the presence of interrogative word, the verb has no interrogation marker.


Xasani nak ulun ? (PZ) Where does Xasani go ?

~ Xasani so ulun ? (Everywhere else)


Aşela mundes moxt’u ? (PZ) When did Aşela come ?

Aşela munde moxt’u ? (ÇM)(AŞ)

Aşela mundez moxtu ? (FN)(AH)(HP)(ÇX)


Interrogative and assertive sentences have the same construction in Laz.

______________________________________________________________________


11.9.2. Interrogation marker = postfix{-i}


In interrogative sentences without interrogative word, the verb take the interrogation marker {-i}.


There is no interrogative form in imperative, prohibitive and prohibito-optative moods.


If the postfix {-i} is preceded by a vowel, epenthetic consonant /y/ is sometimes heard between two vowels. It is not graphically represented in this study.


If the postfix{-i} is preceded by a consonant, the latter and the postfix are pronounced forming a syllable. There is no caesura before the postfix.


Concerning the prosodie, the postfix {-i} is independent of what precedes it. It has its own accent and is pronounced always with falling tone.



Aşela moxt’u-i ? (West) Did Aşela come ?

~ Aşela moxtu-i ? (CentreEast)


Xasani moxt’asere-i ? (PZ-westcentre) Will Xasani come ?

~ Xasani moxt’asen-i ? (PZ-east)(ÇM)(AŞ)

~ Xasani moxtasen-i ? (FN)(AH)

~ Xasani moxtasinon-i ? (HP-Makreal)

~ Xasani moxtasunon-i ? (HP-Mxigi)

~ Xasani moxtasun-i ? (ÇX)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


●●● In Pazar sometimes, and in Çamlıhemşin and Ardeşen (except at Dutxe) regularly, the replacement of final consonnat(s) /-s/, /-ms/ and /-rs/ by /-y/ is observed in assertive sentences. This phenomenon does not occur in the presence of postfix {-i}.


t’axuy he breaks t’axums-i ? does he break ?

mç’i(y) it rains mç’i(m)s-i ? does it rain ?

u3’ome(y) he tells him u3’omers-i ? does he tell him ?

imxoy he eats imxors-i ? does he eat ?

ide(y) they went ides-i ? did they go ?

komoxt’ay he shall come moxt’as-i ? shall he come ?


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


●●● Epithetic vowels /-u/ and /-e/ appear after final consonants /-ms/, /-rs/, /-mt/ and /-rt/ in assertive sentences in the dialects of Çamlıhemşin and Ardeşen. They are not observed in interrogative sentences.


çamsu (AŞ- Dutxe) he gives to eat çams-i ? does he give to eat ?

imxorsu (AŞ- Dutxe) he eats imxors-i ? does he eat ?


p’t’axumtu we break p’t’axumt-i ? do we break ?

~ p’t’axumte (ÇM- M3’anu)


vimxortu we eat vimxort-i ? do we eat ?

~ vimxorte (ÇM- M3’anu)

______________________________________________________________________


11.10. Affix concatenation within verb complex


Affixes succeed one another within Laz verb complex according to the following order.


[See infra for : affixes forming causative stems (→ 12.5.), pluperfet tense marker (→ 13.), auditive past tense marker (→ 13.), conditional and concessive clause marker (→ 16.), adnominal and nominal clause marker (→ 17.)]


[1] profix (1) adnominal and nominal clause marker {na-}

affirmation profixes {o-, menda-, do-, ko-} 

[2] negation marker {var- ~ va-, etc}

[3] preverb {me-, mo-, dolo-, etc}

[4] person marker {v- ~ b-, ø-}{m-, g-, ø-}

[5] pre-stem {ø-, i-, i-/u-, a-, o-}

[6] stem

[7] causative stem marker I {-in-}

[8] causative stem marker II {-ap-}

[9] post-stem {-am, -em, -om, -um ; -er, -ur ; -omer ~ -umer}

[10] non-present marker {-t’-}(3) 

[11] optative mood marker {-a}(2)(3) 

[12] person marker {-ø, -s, -n, -an ; -i,-u, -es ~ -ez}(4)(6) 

[13] plural marker {-t}(4)(5) 

[14] penultimate suffix pluperfect tense marker {-dort’un}

auditive past tense marker {-doren}

votive mood marker {-k’o}(5)(6) 

[15] postfix (7) interrogation marker {-i }

conditional and concessive clause marker {-na} 



(1) The marker of prohibitive and prohibito-optative moods {mot} is also a profix as well as the marker of « exclamatory sentences with na » (→ 18.).


(2) The optative mood marker is attached directly to the stem when it forms the perfective optative.


(3) Future tenses of verb of existence and stative verbs derive from imperfective-optative mood. In the formation of future-in-the-past, the morpheme {-t’-} appears twice within a verb complex : once as « expectation marker forming imperfective optative mood » and for the second time as « recollection marker forming imperfective past tense » (→ 13.).


mişk’ut’asert’u (West) I was going to know

miçkit’at’u ~ miçkit’astun (FN)(*)

miçkit’asunt’u (HP)


(*) In the form miçkit’astun, the second phoneme in bold letters is non-ejective

consonant /t/. In central and eastern dialects, ejective consonants lose regularly their

ejectivity after fricative consonant.


(4) Postposed person markers are in the same time tense markers. Most of them are also number markers (→ 11.2., 11.3., 11.4.).


(5) Plural marker {-t} takes place after votive mood marker in western dialects (→ 11.5.1.3.1.).


(6) In western dialects, votive mood marker is « infixed » within 3rd person plural marker (→ 11.5.1.3.1.).


(7) Affix type postposed subordinative conjunctions ({-şa}{-şi } etc) are also profixes (→ 6.2., 6.3.). There is no clear border between suffixes and words in Laz language.


●●● For the affix concatenation in the formation of participles (→ 14.) and verbal nouns (→ 15.), see respective chapters.